CZFS
Price
$56.70
Change
-$2.16 (-3.67%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
272.57M
70 days until earnings call
DBIN
Price
$36.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
403.72M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZFS vs DBIN

Header iconCZFS vs DBIN Comparison
Open Charts CZFS vs DBINBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Services
Price$56.70
Change-$2.16 (-3.67%)
Volume$5.35K
Capitalization272.57M
Dacotah Banks
Price$36.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$600
Capitalization403.72M
CZFS vs DBIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZFS vs. DBIN commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZFS is a Hold and DBIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CZFS: $56.70 vs. DBIN: $36.25)
Brand notoriety: CZFS and DBIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZFS: 54% vs. DBIN: 31%
Market capitalization -- CZFS: $272.57M vs. DBIN: $403.72M
CZFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $272.57M. DBIN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $403.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDBIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CZFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DBIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CZFS and DBIN are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DBIN’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • DBIN’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZFS is a better buy in the short-term than DBIN.

Price Growth

CZFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.08% price change this week, while DBIN (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBIN($404M) has a higher market cap than CZFS($273M). DBIN has higher P/E ratio than CZFS: DBIN (15.23) vs CZFS (8.61). DBIN YTD gains are higher at: 8.742 vs. CZFS (-7.968). DBIN has less debt than CZFS: DBIN (4M) vs CZFS (302M).
CZFSDBINCZFS / DBIN
Capitalization273M404M68%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.9688.742-91%
P/E Ratio8.6115.2357%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A67.6M-
Total Debt302M4M7,550%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZFS vs DBIN: Fundamental Ratings
CZFS
DBIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7052
SMR RATING
1..100
4743
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4136
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a34

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZFS's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DBIN (70). This means that CZFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than DBIN’s over the last 12 months.

DBIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CZFS (70). This means that DBIN’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

DBIN's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CZFS (47). This means that DBIN’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

DBIN's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CZFS (60). This means that DBIN’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

DBIN's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CZFS (41). This means that DBIN’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZFSDBIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WMMVY30.150.36
+1.21%
Wal-Mart De Mexico S.A.B. de C.V.
HWDJY51.46N/A
N/A
Howden Joinery Group Plc
MFRVF0.18N/A
N/A
Minera Frisco S A B
SRNN11.25N/A
N/A
Southern Banc Company, Inc. (The)
PONGF0.15-0.03
-16.61%
Atari

CZFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZFS has been closely correlated with BFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZFS jumps, then BFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZFS
1D Price
Change %
CZFS100%
-3.67%
BFC - CZFS
70%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
MCBS - CZFS
70%
Closely correlated
-1.95%
AROW - CZFS
69%
Closely correlated
-2.66%
PFIS - CZFS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
SMBC - CZFS
68%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
More

DBIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBIN and WFCL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBIN and WFCL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBIN
1D Price
Change %
DBIN100%
N/A
WFCL - DBIN
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBSDY - DBIN
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
CZFS - DBIN
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.67%
CZBC - DBIN
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
DBSDF - DBIN
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
More