CZASF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
184.14M
GPGNF
Price
$1.57
Change
+$0.12 (+8.28%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.61B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZASF vs GPGNF

Header iconCZASF vs GPGNF Comparison
Open Charts CZASF vs GPGNFBanner chart's image
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.47K
Capitalization184.14M
Grupo Gigante S.A.B. de C.V
Price$1.57
Change+$0.12 (+8.28%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.61B
CZASF vs GPGNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CZASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZASF vs. GPGNF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZASF is a Hold and GPGNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CZASF: $0.01 vs. GPGNF: $1.57)
Brand notoriety: CZASF and GPGNF are both not notable
CZASF represents the Automotive Aftermarket, while GPGNF is part of the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZASF: 100% vs. GPGNF: 249%
Market capitalization -- CZASF: $184.2M vs. GPGNF: $1.61B
CZASF [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $184.2M. GPGNF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $51.28B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $49.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.98B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGPGNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CZASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GPGNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPGNF is a better buy in the long-term than CZASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZASF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPGNF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZASF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • GPGNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPGNF is a better buy in the short-term than CZASF.

Price Growth

CZASF (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GPGNF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -2.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.25%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-2.47% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

@Specialty Stores (+0.83% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPGNF($1.61B) has a higher market cap than CZASF($184M). CZASF (0.000) and GPGNF (0.000) have similar YTD gains .
CZASFGPGNFCZASF / GPGNF
Capitalization184M1.61B11%
EBITDAN/A6.94B-
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E RatioN/A14.39-
RevenueN/A35.2B-
Total CashN/A4.53B-
Total DebtN/A16.3B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZASF vs GPGNF: Fundamental Ratings
CZASF
GPGNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2840
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10041
SMR RATING
1..100
9978
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8462
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPGNF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZASF (65). This means that GPGNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

GPGNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZASF (100). This means that GPGNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

GPGNF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CZASF (99). This means that GPGNF’s stock grew similarly to CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

GPGNF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CZASF (76). This means that GPGNF’s stock grew similarly to CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

GPGNF's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as CZASF (84). This means that GPGNF’s stock grew similarly to CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZASFGPGNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIVIX28.840.29
+1.02%
Madison Large Cap I
ALVAX24.210.24
+1.00%
American Beacon Large Cap Value A
NEAGX55.950.34
+0.61%
Needham Aggressive Growth Retail
SUPCX20.450.11
+0.54%
DWS Equity Sector Strategy Fund Class C
JUEAX27.940.14
+0.50%
JPMorgan US Equity A

CZASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CZASF and CMEIF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZASF and CMEIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZASF
1D Price
Change %
CZASF100%
N/A
CMEIF - CZASF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFRYF - CZASF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DUFRY - CZASF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKRAF - CZASF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSITF - CZASF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GPGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPGNF has been loosely correlated with BWMX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPGNF jumps, then BWMX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPGNF
1D Price
Change %
GPGNF100%
N/A
BWMX - GPGNF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
DUFRY - GPGNF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
IHCPF - GPGNF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZASF - GPGNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLFDY - GPGNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More