CZASF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
198.56M
DNLMY
Price
$15.79
Change
-$0.86 (-5.17%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZASF vs DNLMY

Header iconCZASF vs DNLMY Comparison
Open Charts CZASF vs DNLMYBanner chart's image
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.47K
Capitalization198.56M
Dunelm Group
Price$15.79
Change-$0.86 (-5.17%)
Volume$2.37K
Capitalization2.98B
CZASF vs DNLMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DNLMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZASF vs. DNLMY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZASF is a Hold and DNLMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CZASF: $0.01 vs. DNLMY: $15.79)
Brand notoriety: CZASF and DNLMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZASF: 100% vs. DNLMY: 181%
Market capitalization -- CZASF: $198.56M vs. DNLMY: $2.98B
CZASF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $198.56M. DNLMY’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $2.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDNLMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CZASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DNLMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DNLMY is a better buy in the long-term than CZASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNLMY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DNLMY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CZASF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DNLMY (@Specialty Stores) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.51% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNLMY($2.98B) has a higher market cap than CZASF($199M). DNLMY YTD gains are higher at: 33.445 vs. CZASF (0.000). DNLMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 277M vs. CZASF (-33.49M). CZASF has higher revenues than DNLMY: CZASF (21B) vs DNLMY (1.62B).
CZASFDNLMYCZASF / DNLMY
Capitalization199M2.98B7%
EBITDA-33.49M277M-12%
Gain YTD0.00033.445-
P/E RatioN/A15.46-
Revenue21B1.62B1,295%
Total Cash745MN/A-
Total Debt18.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZASF vs DNLMY: Fundamental Ratings
CZASF
DNLMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
9915
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8646
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DNLMY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as CZASF (45). This means that DNLMY’s stock grew similarly to CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

DNLMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CZASF (100). This means that DNLMY’s stock grew similarly to CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

DNLMY's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CZASF (99). This means that DNLMY’s stock grew significantly faster than CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

DNLMY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZASF (78). This means that DNLMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

DNLMY's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZASF (86). This means that DNLMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZASFDNLMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNLMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRWTX26.410.19
+0.72%
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R3
LAMAX23.780.08
+0.34%
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth A
CLBAX36.440.10
+0.28%
American Funds American Balanced 529A
OTCRX14.030.01
+0.07%
Otter Creek Long/Short Opportunity Inv
JOEMX13.44-0.04
-0.30%
JOHCM Emerging Markets Opps Instl

CZASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CZASF and CMEIF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZASF and CMEIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZASF
1D Price
Change %
CZASF100%
N/A
CMEIF - CZASF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFRYF - CZASF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DUFRY - CZASF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
FKRAF - CZASF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSITF - CZASF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DNLMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNLMY and JZXN have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNLMY and JZXN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNLMY
1D Price
Change %
DNLMY100%
N/A
JZXN - DNLMY
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
HLFDY - DNLMY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHCPF - DNLMY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZASF - DNLMY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYYHF - DNLMY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More