Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZAR vs IOO
CZAR vs IOO Comparison
Open Charts CZAR vs IOO
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
Price$32.09
Change+$0.30 (+0.94%)
Volume$226
Net Assets1.59M
iShares Global 100 ETF
Price$110.63
Change-$0.20 (-0.18%)
Volume$113.1K
Net Assets6.78B
CZAR vs IOO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZAR vs. IOO commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZAR is a Hold and IOO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IOO has more net assets: 6.78B vs. CZAR (1.59M). CZAR has a higher annual dividend yield than IOO: CZAR (12.155) vs IOO (10.541). CZAR was incepted earlier than IOO: CZAR (2 years) vs IOO (25 years). CZAR (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IOO (0.40). CZAR has a higher turnover IOO (6.00) vs IOO (6.00).
| CZAR | IOO | CZAR / IOO | |
| Gain YTD | 12.155 | 10.541 | 115% |
| Net Assets | 1.59M | 6.78B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.40 | 87% |
| Turnover | 113.00 | 6.00 | 1,883% |
| Yield | 0.85 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZAR | IOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZAR has been loosely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZAR jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZAR | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| FTV - CZAR | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| LIN - CZAR | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| CRH - CZAR | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| BLK - CZAR | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| ADI - CZAR | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.07% | ||
More | ||||
IOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IOO has been closely correlated with QCOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IOO jumps, then QCOM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOO | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| QCOM - IOO | 77% Closely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| MSFT - IOO | 74% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| AMZN - IOO | 70% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| AVGO - IOO | 69% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| GOOGL - IOO | 68% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
More | ||||