Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs VXF
CZA vs VXF Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs VXF
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$109.03
Change-$0.47 (-0.43%)
Volume$295
Net Assets182.7M
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
Price$208.03
Change+$0.25 (+0.12%)
Volume$750
Net Assets81.53B
CZA vs VXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. VXF commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Buy and VXF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VXF has more net assets: 81.5B vs. CZA (183M). VXF has a higher annual dividend yield than CZA: VXF (9.538) vs CZA (5.399). CZA was incepted earlier than VXF: CZA (18 years) vs VXF (24 years). VXF (0.05) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover VXF (11.00) vs VXF (11.00).
| CZA | VXF | CZA / VXF | |
| Gain YTD | 5.399 | 9.538 | 57% |
| Net Assets | 183M | 81.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.05 | 1,380% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 11.00 | 1,018% |
| Yield | 1.21 | 1.07 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | VXF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WGUSX | 15.25 | 0.21 | +1.40% |
| Wasatch US Select Inst | |||
| MAPPX | 27.49 | 0.26 | +0.95% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Advantage A | |||
| LGOTX | 36.62 | 0.10 | +0.27% |
| Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R5 | |||
| BMRRX | 34.71 | 0.09 | +0.26% |
| BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity R | |||
| NRARX | 52.59 | -0.34 | -0.64% |
| Neuberger Berman Quality Equity R3 | |||
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZA and IVZ have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZA and IVZ's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
VXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VXF has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VXF jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VXF | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| APO - VXF | 72% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| KKR - VXF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| FERG - VXF | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| MRVL - VXF | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| SNOW - VXF | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
More | ||||