Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs VO
CZA vs VO Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs VO
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$115.87
Change+$1.07 (+0.93%)
Volume$702
Net Assets186.91M
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
Price$297.07
Change+$0.37 (+0.12%)
Volume$608
Net Assets198.74B
CZA vs VO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. VO commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and VO is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VO has more net assets: 199B vs. CZA (187M). CZA has a higher annual dividend yield than VO: CZA (2.681) vs VO (2.233). CZA was incepted earlier than VO: CZA (19 years) vs VO (22 years). VO (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover VO (16.00) vs VO (16.00).
| CZA | VO | CZA / VO | |
| Gain YTD | 2.681 | 2.233 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 187M | 199B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.04 | 1,725% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 16.00 | 700% |
| Yield | 1.51 | 1.49 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 22 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DGT | 175.39 | 0.54 | +0.31% |
| State Street® SPDR® Global Dow ETF | |||
| JMST | 51.02 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Inc ETF | |||
| PBFR | 29.37 | -0.08 | -0.27% |
| PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | |||
| ESG | 160.91 | -1.27 | -0.79% |
| FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select ETF | |||
| PSCU | 58.31 | -0.83 | -1.41% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Ult & Comnc Svc ETF | |||
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZA | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| CRBG - CZA | 77% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| CR - CZA | 68% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| GEN - CZA | 67% Closely correlated | -5.63% | ||
| LEVI - CZA | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| ESNT - CZA | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
More | ||||
VO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VO has been closely correlated with DOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VO jumps, then DOV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y