Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs SCHM
CZA vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs SCHM
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$111.75
Change-$0.06 (-0.05%)
Volume$161
Net Assets183.14M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$30.25
Change+$0.17 (+0.57%)
Volume$628
Net Assets12.21B
CZA vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. SCHM commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Buy and SCHM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.2B vs. CZA (183M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than CZA: SCHM (9.722) vs CZA (7.620). CZA was incepted earlier than SCHM: CZA (19 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| CZA | SCHM | CZA / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 7.620 | 9.722 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 183M | 12.2B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.04 | 1,725% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 13.00 | 862% |
| Yield | 1.18 | 1.41 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 73% | 18 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NUMV | 39.18 | 0.24 | +0.62% |
| Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | |||
| TWOX | 27.92 | 0.12 | +0.42% |
| iShares Large Cp Accelerated Outcome ETF | |||
| BSSX | 25.77 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2033 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| RING | 69.07 | -0.48 | -0.69% |
| iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | |||
| SEF | 31.74 | -0.40 | -1.26% |
| ProShares Short Financials | |||
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.80% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.75% | ||
More | ||||