Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs SCHM
CZA vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs SCHM
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$112.19
Change-$0.06 (-0.05%)
Volume$3.42K
Net Assets184M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$30.65
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
Volume$675.59K
Net Assets12.53B
CZA vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. SCHM commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a StrongBuy and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.5B vs. CZA (184M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than CZA: SCHM (11.801) vs CZA (7.987). CZA was incepted earlier than SCHM: CZA (19 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover SCHM (17.00) vs SCHM (17.00).
| CZA | SCHM | CZA / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 7.987 | 11.801 | 68% |
| Net Assets | 184M | 12.5B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.04 | 1,725% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 17.00 | 659% |
| Yield | 1.18 | 1.41 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 11 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
More | ||||