Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs SCHM
CZA vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs SCHM
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$108.25
Change+$0.54 (+0.50%)
Volume$936
Net Assets179.92M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$29.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
Volume$934.3K
Net Assets12.07B
CZA vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. SCHM commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and SCHM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.1B vs. CZA (180M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than CZA: SCHM (7.570) vs CZA (4.200). CZA was incepted earlier than SCHM: CZA (19 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| CZA | SCHM | CZA / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 4.200 | 7.570 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 180M | 12.1B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.04 | 1,725% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 13.00 | 862% |
| Yield | 1.20 | 1.43 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 72% | 10 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZA and FMC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZA and FMC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
More | ||||