Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs MDY
CZA vs MDY Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs MDY
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$109.03
Change-$0.47 (-0.43%)
Volume$295
Net Assets182.7M
SPDR® S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust
Price$601.01
Change-$1.88 (-0.31%)
Volume$547
Net Assets24.08B
CZA vs MDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. MDY commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Buy and MDY is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDY has more net assets: 24.1B vs. CZA (183M). MDY has a higher annual dividend yield than CZA: MDY (6.450) vs CZA (5.399). CZA was incepted earlier than MDY: CZA (18 years) vs MDY (30 years). MDY (0.24) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover MDY (20.43) vs MDY (20.43).
| CZA | MDY | CZA / MDY | |
| Gain YTD | 5.399 | 6.450 | 84% |
| Net Assets | 183M | 24.1B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.24 | 288% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 20.43 | 548% |
| Yield | 1.21 | 1.15 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 30 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WGUSX | 15.25 | 0.21 | +1.40% |
| Wasatch US Select Inst | |||
| MAPPX | 27.49 | 0.26 | +0.95% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Advantage A | |||
| LGOTX | 36.62 | 0.10 | +0.27% |
| Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R5 | |||
| BMRRX | 34.71 | 0.09 | +0.26% |
| BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity R | |||
| NRARX | 52.59 | -0.34 | -0.64% |
| Neuberger Berman Quality Equity R3 | |||
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZA and IVZ have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZA and IVZ's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
MDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDY has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDY jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDY | 100% | +0.47% | ||
| AVNT - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| FHN - MDY | 76% Closely correlated | -2.41% | ||
| CG - MDY | 73% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| GGG - MDY | 73% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| IBOC - MDY | 72% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
More | ||||