Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs MDY
CZA vs MDY Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs MDY
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$107.47
Change-$0.71 (-0.66%)
Volume$483
Net Assets181.68M
SPDR® S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust
Price$580.05
Change-$2.99 (-0.51%)
Volume$613K
Net Assets23.02B
CZA vs MDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. MDY commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and MDY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDY has more net assets: 23B vs. CZA (182M). CZA has a higher annual dividend yield than MDY: CZA (3.445) vs MDY (2.418). CZA was incepted earlier than MDY: CZA (18 years) vs MDY (30 years). MDY (0.24) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover MDY (20.43) vs MDY (20.43).
| CZA | MDY | CZA / MDY | |
| Gain YTD | 3.445 | 2.418 | 143% |
| Net Assets | 182M | 23B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.24 | 288% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 20.43 | 548% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 1.19 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 30 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZA and FOX have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZA and FOX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
MDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDY has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDY jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDY | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| AVNT - MDY | 80% Closely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| FHN - MDY | 76% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| CG - MDY | 72% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| GGG - MDY | 72% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| IBOC - MDY | 72% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
More | ||||