Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs IWR
CZA vs IWR Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs IWR
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$115.87
Change+$1.07 (+0.93%)
Volume$702
Net Assets186.91M
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Price$99.58
Change-$0.22 (-0.22%)
Volume$953
Net Assets47.7B
CZA vs IWR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. IWR commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and IWR is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWR has more net assets: 47.7B vs. CZA (187M). IWR has a higher annual dividend yield than CZA: IWR (3.667) vs CZA (2.681). CZA was incepted earlier than IWR: CZA (19 years) vs IWR (25 years). IWR (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover IWR (11.00) vs IWR (11.00).
| CZA | IWR | CZA / IWR | |
| Gain YTD | 2.681 | 3.667 | 73% |
| Net Assets | 187M | 47.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.18 | 383% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 11.00 | 1,018% |
| Yield | 1.51 | 1.25 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DWX | 45.94 | 0.29 | +0.63% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P® Intl Div ETF | |||
| TDSC | 26.19 | 0.15 | +0.58% |
| ETC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | |||
| VIOO | 118.30 | -0.19 | -0.16% |
| Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF | |||
| ABCS | 30.98 | -0.15 | -0.48% |
| Alpha Blue Capital US Sm-Md Cp Dyn ETF | |||
| BAI | 34.26 | -0.41 | -1.18% |
| iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF | |||
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZA | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| CRBG - CZA | 77% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| CR - CZA | 68% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| GEN - CZA | 67% Closely correlated | -5.63% | ||
| LEVI - CZA | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| ESNT - CZA | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
More | ||||