Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs IWR
CZA vs IWR Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs IWR
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$109.03
Change+$0.55 (+0.51%)
Volume$2.62K
Net Assets185.6M
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Price$95.32
Change+$0.59 (+0.62%)
Volume$1.58M
Net Assets43.85B
CZA vs IWR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. IWR commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a StrongBuy and IWR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWR has more net assets: 43.8B vs. CZA (186M). IWR has a higher annual dividend yield than CZA: IWR (8.476) vs CZA (4.946). CZA was incepted earlier than IWR: CZA (18 years) vs IWR (24 years). IWR (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover IWR (11.00) vs IWR (11.00).
| CZA | IWR | CZA / IWR | |
| Gain YTD | 4.946 | 8.476 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 186M | 43.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.19 | 363% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 11.00 | 1,018% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 1.33 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with PFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then PFG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y