CZA | IJH | CZA / IJH | |
Gain YTD | 4.200 | 4.415 | 95% |
Net Assets | 180M | 98.7B | 0% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.05 | 1,380% |
Turnover | 112.00 | 18.00 | 622% |
Yield | 1.20 | 1.27 | 94% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
CZA | IJH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 4 days ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago81% | 5 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago72% | 10 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago89% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZA and FMC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZA and FMC's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IJH has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IJH jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.