Intraday BUY SELL Signals
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs GEN
CZA vs GEN Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs GEN
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$115.87
Change+$1.07 (+0.93%)
Volume$702
Net Assets186.91M
Gen Digital
Price$22.97
Change+$0.52 (+2.32%)
Volume$1.21K
Capitalization13.85B
CZA vs GEN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. GEN commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and GEN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GEN: Fundamental Ratings
GEN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | GEN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 10 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZA | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| CRBG - CZA | 77% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| CR - CZA | 68% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| GEN - CZA | 67% Closely correlated | -5.63% | ||
| LEVI - CZA | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| ESNT - CZA | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
More | ||||
GEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GEN has been closely correlated with PAYC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GEN jumps, then PAYC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEN | 100% | -5.63% | ||
| PAYC - GEN | 67% Closely correlated | -6.74% | ||
| OSPN - GEN | 57% Loosely correlated | -6.04% | ||
| EEFT - GEN | 56% Loosely correlated | -6.31% | ||
| GEHC - GEN | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| ADSK - GEN | 56% Loosely correlated | -5.78% | ||
More | ||||