CYYHF
Price
$0.27
Change
-$0.01 (-3.57%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
883.73M
HLFDY
Price
$4.50
Change
+$0.01 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
622.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYYHF vs HLFDY

Header iconCYYHF vs HLFDY Comparison
Open Charts CYYHF vs HLFDYBanner chart's image
China Yongda Automobile Svcs
Price$0.27
Change-$0.01 (-3.57%)
Volume$80K
Capitalization883.73M
Halfords Group
Price$4.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.22%)
Volume$100
Capitalization622.42M
CYYHF vs HLFDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HLFDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYYHF vs. HLFDY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYYHF is a Hold and HLFDY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CYYHF: $0.27 vs. HLFDY: $4.50)
Brand notoriety: CYYHF and HLFDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYYHF: 100% vs. HLFDY: 23%
Market capitalization -- CYYHF: $883.73M vs. HLFDY: $622.42M
CYYHF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $883.73M. HLFDY’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $622.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYYHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLFDY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CYYHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLFDY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLFDY is a better buy in the long-term than CYYHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLFDY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HLFDY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CYYHF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HLFDY (@Specialty Stores) price change was -2.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.51% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CYYHF($884M) has a higher market cap than HLFDY($622M). HLFDY has higher P/E ratio than CYYHF: HLFDY (15.17) vs CYYHF (4.97). HLFDY YTD gains are higher at: 42.857 vs. CYYHF (0.000). CYYHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.03B vs. HLFDY (182M). CYYHF has more cash in the bank: 2.34B vs. HLFDY (63.6M). HLFDY has less debt than CYYHF: HLFDY (414M) vs CYYHF (7.01B). CYYHF has higher revenues than HLFDY: CYYHF (77.9B) vs HLFDY (1.44B).
CYYHFHLFDYCYYHF / HLFDY
Capitalization884M622M142%
EBITDA5.03B182M2,766%
Gain YTD0.00042.857-
P/E Ratio4.9715.1733%
Revenue77.9B1.44B5,410%
Total Cash2.34B63.6M3,684%
Total Debt7.01B414M1,692%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYYHF vs HLFDY: Fundamental Ratings
CYYHF
HLFDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5094
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4389
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5115
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CYYHF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as HLFDY (8). This means that CYYHF’s stock grew similarly to HLFDY’s over the last 12 months.

CYYHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HLFDY (100). This means that CYYHF’s stock grew similarly to HLFDY’s over the last 12 months.

CYYHF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLFDY (89). This means that CYYHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLFDY’s over the last 12 months.

HLFDY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CYYHF (71). This means that HLFDY’s stock grew similarly to CYYHF’s over the last 12 months.

HLFDY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYYHF (51). This means that HLFDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYYHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYYHFHLFDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLFDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHCGX55.600.56
+1.02%
Chesapeake Growth
NWHYX14.560.08
+0.55%
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Gr Instl Svc
SSSWX463.322.43
+0.53%
State Street Equity 500 Index I
SVTAX11.100.05
+0.45%
SEI Global Managed Volatility F (SIMT)
PGEMX26.090.05
+0.19%
George Putnam Balanced M

CYYHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYYHF has been loosely correlated with JBHIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYYHF jumps, then JBHIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYYHF
1D Price
Change %
CYYHF100%
N/A
JBHIF - CYYHF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TKLF - CYYHF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HLFDY - CYYHF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWTL - CYYHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKRAF - CYYHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLFDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLFDY and CYYHF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLFDY and CYYHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLFDY
1D Price
Change %
HLFDY100%
N/A
CYYHF - HLFDY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHCPF - HLFDY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNLMY - HLFDY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPGNF - HLFDY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZASF - HLFDY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More