CYVF
Price
$68.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
86.85M
ILPMY
Price
$2.48
Change
-$0.15 (-5.70%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.46B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYVF vs ILPMY

Header iconCYVF vs ILPMY Comparison
Open Charts CYVF vs ILPMYBanner chart's image
Crystal Valley Financial
Price$68.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$888
Capitalization86.85M
Permanent TSB Group Holdings
Price$2.48
Change-$0.15 (-5.70%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization1.46B
CYVF vs ILPMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CYVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ILPMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYVF vs. ILPMY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYVF is a StrongBuy and ILPMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CYVF: $68.00 vs. ILPMY: $2.48)
Brand notoriety: CYVF and ILPMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYVF: 37% vs. ILPMY: 222%
Market capitalization -- CYVF: $86.85M vs. ILPMY: $1.46B
CYVF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $86.85M. ILPMY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileILPMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CYVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ILPMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ILPMY is a better buy in the long-term than CYVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYVF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ILPMY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ILPMY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CYVF and ILPMY are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CYVF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ILPMY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILPMY($1.46B) has a higher market cap than CYVF($86.9M). ILPMY has higher P/E ratio than CYVF: ILPMY (16.36) vs CYVF (7.68). ILPMY YTD gains are higher at: 43.768 vs. CYVF (8.592). CYVF has less debt than ILPMY: CYVF (39.5M) vs ILPMY (1.97B). ILPMY has higher revenues than CYVF: ILPMY (658M) vs CYVF (34.3M).
CYVFILPMYCYVF / ILPMY
Capitalization86.9M1.46B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.59243.76820%
P/E Ratio7.6816.3647%
Revenue34.3M658M5%
Total Cash12.1MN/A-
Total Debt39.5M1.97B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYVF vs ILPMY: Fundamental Ratings
CYVF
ILPMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1240
SMR RATING
1..100
5116
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4830
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CYVF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ILPMY (64). This means that CYVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ILPMY’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as ILPMY (40). This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to ILPMY’s over the last 12 months.

ILPMY's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYVF (51). This means that ILPMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

ILPMY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CYVF (52). This means that ILPMY’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

ILPMY's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as CYVF (48). This means that ILPMY’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYVFILPMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
32%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
32%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CYVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ILPMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAUTF4.410.26
+6.27%
Montage Gold Corp.
FOLGF0.11N/A
+1.62%
Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd.
BBVXF18.260.26
+1.45%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
ZHUZY19.39N/A
N/A
Zhuzhou CRRC Times Electric Co., Ltd.
TCNB5.98N/A
N/A
Town Center Bank (IL)

CYVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYVF and ILPMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYVF and ILPMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYVF
1D Price
Change %
CYVF100%
N/A
ILPMY - CYVF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMST - CYVF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFBK - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
FSUN - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
SSBI - CYVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More

ILPMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ILPMY and PBLOF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ILPMY and PBLOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ILPMY
1D Price
Change %
ILPMY100%
N/A
PBLOF - ILPMY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYVF - ILPMY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNRV - ILPMY
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
FSUN - ILPMY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
HMST - ILPMY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More