CYVF
Price
$67.00
Change
+$0.50 (+0.75%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
85.58M
CZNL
Price
$42.24
Change
-$0.61 (-1.42%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
41.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYVF vs CZNL

Header iconCYVF vs CZNL Comparison
Open Charts CYVF vs CZNLBanner chart's image
Crystal Valley Financial
Price$67.00
Change+$0.50 (+0.75%)
Volume$100
Capitalization85.58M
Citizens National
Price$42.24
Change-$0.61 (-1.42%)
Volume$500
Capitalization41.28M
CYVF vs CZNL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CYVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYVF vs. CZNL commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYVF is a Buy and CZNL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CYVF: $67.00 vs. CZNL: $41.99)
Brand notoriety: CYVF and CZNL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYVF: 4% vs. CZNL: 100%
Market capitalization -- CYVF: $85.58M vs. CZNL: $41.28M
CYVF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $85.58M. CZNL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $41.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCZNL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CYVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CZNL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYVF is a better buy in the long-term than CZNL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYVF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CZNL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CZNL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZNL is a better buy in the short-term than CYVF.

Price Growth

CYVF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.75% price change this week, while CZNL (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CYVF($85.6M) has a higher market cap than CZNL($41.3M). CZNL has higher P/E ratio than CYVF: CZNL (8.89) vs CYVF (7.57). CYVF YTD gains are higher at: 6.995 vs. CZNL (-7.658). CZNL has less debt than CYVF: CZNL (6.2M) vs CYVF (39.5M).
CYVFCZNLCYVF / CZNL
Capitalization85.6M41.3M207%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.995-7.658-91%
P/E Ratio7.578.8985%
Revenue34.3MN/A-
Total Cash12.1MN/A-
Total Debt39.5M6.2M637%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYVF vs CZNL: Fundamental Ratings
CYVF
CZNL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
5155
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5230
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5049

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZNL's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as CYVF (26). This means that CZNL’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CZNL (100). This means that CYVF’s stock grew significantly faster than CZNL’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CZNL (55). This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to CZNL’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CZNL (57). This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to CZNL’s over the last 12 months.

CZNL's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as CYVF (52). This means that CZNL’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYVFCZNL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
7%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
9%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
9%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
32%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
32%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
9%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CYVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDEXF51.953.05
+6.24%
Industria de Diseno Textil Inditex SA
DPNEF0.06N/A
N/A
Daphne International Holdings Ltd.
ICGUF27.50N/A
N/A
Intermediate Capital Group Plc.
PAFRF0.61N/A
N/A
Pan African Resources PLC
BCMRF0.10N/A
N/A
BCM Resources Corp.

CYVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYVF and ILPMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYVF and ILPMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYVF
1D Price
Change %
CYVF100%
N/A
ILPMY - CYVF
29%
Poorly correlated
+22.95%
HMST - CYVF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
CFBK - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
FSUN - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
SSBI - CYVF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.50%
More

CZNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CZNL and WVFC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZNL and WVFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZNL
1D Price
Change %
CZNL100%
N/A
WVFC - CZNL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOGN - CZNL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYVF - CZNL
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBSDF - CZNL
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
CZBC - CZNL
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
More