CYSNF
Price
$0.67
Change
-$0.01 (-1.47%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
43.74M
MFCO
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.09 (-19.57%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYSNF vs MFCO

Header iconCYSNF vs MFCO Comparison
Open Charts CYSNF vs MFCOBanner chart's image
C-COM Satellite Systems
Price$0.67
Change-$0.01 (-1.47%)
Volume$24.92K
Capitalization43.74M
Microwave Filter
Price$0.37
Change-$0.09 (-19.57%)
Volume$226
Capitalization2.06M
CYSNF vs MFCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CYSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYSNF vs. MFCO commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYSNF is a Hold and MFCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (CYSNF: $0.67 vs. MFCO: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: CYSNF and MFCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYSNF: 494% vs. MFCO: 19%
Market capitalization -- CYSNF: $43.74M vs. MFCO: $2.06M
CYSNF [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $43.74M. MFCO’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $2.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYSNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CYSNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFCO is a better buy in the long-term than CYSNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYSNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFCO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYSNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MFCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFCO is a better buy in the short-term than CYSNF.

Price Growth

CYSNF (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -7.20% price change this week, while MFCO (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -20.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +3.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+3.80% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CYSNF($43.7M) has a higher market cap than MFCO($2.06M). CYSNF has higher P/E ratio than MFCO: CYSNF (3160.90) vs MFCO (13.37). MFCO YTD gains are higher at: 10.909 vs. CYSNF (-17.069). MFCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 196K vs. CYSNF (-583.93K). CYSNF has more cash in the bank: 16M vs. MFCO (538K). CYSNF has higher revenues than MFCO: CYSNF (7.37M) vs MFCO (3.76M).
CYSNFMFCOCYSNF / MFCO
Capitalization43.7M2.06M2,118%
EBITDA-583.93K196K-298%
Gain YTD-17.06910.909-156%
P/E Ratio3160.9013.3723,644%
Revenue7.37M3.76M196%
Total Cash16M538K2,974%
Total DebtN/A232K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYSNF vs MFCO: Fundamental Ratings
CYSNF
MFCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9064
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8622
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CYSNF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCO (43). This means that CYSNF’s stock grew similarly to MFCO’s over the last 12 months.

CYSNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCO (100). This means that CYSNF’s stock grew similarly to MFCO’s over the last 12 months.

MFCO's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as CYSNF (90). This means that MFCO’s stock grew similarly to CYSNF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCO's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CYSNF (82). This means that MFCO’s stock grew similarly to CYSNF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCO's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYSNF (86). This means that MFCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYSNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYSNFMFCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CYSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TENX5.960.08
+1.36%
Tenax Therapeutics
ISOU7.170.05
+0.70%
IsoEnergy Ltd
PLYM15.470.08
+0.52%
Plymouth Industrial REIT
HES148.97N/A
N/A
Hess Corp
PECO34.93-0.08
-0.23%
Phillips Edison & Company

CYSNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYSNF and BEWFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYSNF and BEWFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYSNF
1D Price
Change %
CYSNF100%
-2.05%
BEWFF - CYSNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.74%
AIRG - CYSNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+11.63%
MFCO - CYSNF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERIXF - CYSNF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVTZF - CYSNF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MFCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFCO and FKWL have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFCO and FKWL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFCO
1D Price
Change %
MFCO100%
N/A
FKWL - MFCO
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
KPIFF - MFCO
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
CYSNF - MFCO
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
EVTZF - MFCO
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETCIA - MFCO
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More