CYSM
Price
$14.94
Change
+$0.19 (+1.29%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
32.79M
TFC
Price
$46.02
Change
+$0.28 (+0.61%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
59.34B
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYSM vs TFC

Header iconCYSM vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts CYSM vs TFCBanner chart's image
Community Bancorp of Santa Maria
Price$14.94
Change+$0.19 (+1.29%)
Volume$3.13K
Capitalization32.79M
Truist Financial
Price$46.02
Change+$0.28 (+0.61%)
Volume$4.37M
Capitalization59.34B
CYSM vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CYSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYSM vs. TFC commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYSM is a StrongBuy and TFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CYSM: $14.94 vs. TFC: $46.02)
Brand notoriety: CYSM and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYSM: 138% vs. TFC: 60%
Market capitalization -- CYSM: $32.79M vs. TFC: $59.34B
CYSM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $32.79M. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $59.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYSM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CYSM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYSM is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYSM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYSM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than CYSM.

Price Growth

CYSM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.40% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

TFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($59.3B) has a higher market cap than CYSM($32.8M). TFC has higher P/E ratio than CYSM: TFC (12.47) vs CYSM (9.70). CYSM YTD gains are higher at: 42.418 vs. TFC (10.051). TFC has more cash in the bank: 5.16B vs. CYSM (5.62M). CYSM has less debt than TFC: CYSM (14.4M) vs TFC (61.1B).
CYSMTFCCYSM / TFC
Capitalization32.8M59.3B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD42.41810.051422%
P/E Ratio9.7012.4778%
RevenueN/A20B-
Total Cash5.62M5.16B0%
Total Debt14.4M61.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYSM vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
CYSM
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8965
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2967
SMR RATING
1..100
594
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1541
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CYSM's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (74). This means that CYSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

CYSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (67). This means that CYSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYSM (59). This means that TFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYSM’s over the last 12 months.

CYSM's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (50). This means that CYSM’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

CYSM's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (41). This means that CYSM’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYSMTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CYSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRUMF17.722.85
+19.19%
Terumo Corp.
MJDLF8.370.12
+1.49%
Major Drilling Group International Inc.
NWSZF0.83N/A
N/A
CTF Services Limited
IGLDF1.97N/A
N/A
Internet Gold-Golden Lines Ltd.
CNNEF1.78N/A
-0.11%
Canacol Energy Ltd.

CYSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYSM and CBSH have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYSM and CBSH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYSM
1D Price
Change %
CYSM100%
+1.29%
CBSH - CYSM
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
USB - CYSM
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
ZION - CYSM
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
TRVR - CYSM
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TFC - CYSM
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More

TFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFC
1D Price
Change %
TFC100%
+0.61%
HBAN - TFC
92%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
CFG - TFC
92%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
PNC - TFC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
KEY - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
FITB - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
More