CYFWF vs OAMCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYFWF is a Hold and OAMCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYFWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOAMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CYFWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OAMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CYFWF (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OAMCF (@Movies/Entertainment) price change was +11.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was +34.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +79.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.39%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Movies/Entertainment (+34.42% weekly)Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.
| CYFWF | OAMCF | CYFWF / OAMCF | |
| Capitalization | 2.22B | 10M | 22,214% |
| EBITDA | 4.36B | -3.37M | -129,581% |
| Gain YTD | -17.877 | 104.650 | -17% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.77 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 13.1B | 13.7M | 95,620% |
| Total Cash | 1.46B | 10.4M | 14,077% |
| Total Debt | 12.6B | 1.87M | 675,241% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
CYFWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CYFWF and CEVMY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYFWF and CEVMY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYFWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYFWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CEVMY - CYFWF | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.60% | ||
| OAMCF - CYFWF | 9% Poorly correlated | +12.82% | ||
| ENTEF - CYFWF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.26% | ||
| CPOP - CYFWF | 3% Poorly correlated | +4.10% | ||
| KUKE - CYFWF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.73% | ||
More | ||||
OAMCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OAMCF and MCOIF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OAMCF and MCOIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OAMCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAMCF | 100% | +12.82% | ||
| MCOIF - OAMCF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CPOP - OAMCF | 11% Poorly correlated | +4.10% | ||
| CYFWF - OAMCF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RSVR - OAMCF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
| KUKE - OAMCF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.73% | ||
More | ||||