CYFRF
Price
$4.25
Change
+$0.15 (+3.66%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
13.04M
STGC
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

CYFRF vs STGC

Header iconCYFRF vs STGC Comparison
Open Charts CYFRF vs STGCBanner chart's image
SOL STRATEGIES
Price$4.25
Change+$0.15 (+3.66%)
Volume$2.03M
Capitalization13.04M
STARTENGINE CROWDFUNDING
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$42.54K
CapitalizationN/A
CYFRF vs STGC Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYFRF vs. STGC commentary
Jan 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYFRF is a Hold and STGC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CYFRF: $4.25 vs. STGC: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: CYFRF and STGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYFRF: 128% vs. STGC: 100%
Market capitalization -- CYFRF: $13.04M vs. STGC: $0
CYFRF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $13.04M. STGC’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYFRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTGC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CYFRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYFRF is a better buy in the long-term than STGC.

Price Growth

CYFRF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +62.75% price change this week, while STGC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.28% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CYFRF YTD gains are higher at: 104.221 vs. STGC (0.000). CYFRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.83M vs. STGC (-8.63M). STGC has more cash in the bank: 13.8M vs. CYFRF (8.32M). STGC has higher revenues than CYFRF: STGC (21.8M) vs CYFRF (0).
CYFRFSTGCCYFRF / STGC
Capitalization13MN/A-
EBITDA-1.83M-8.63M21%
Gain YTD104.2210.000-
P/E Ratio27.93N/A-
Revenue021.8M-
Total Cash8.32M13.8M60%
Total Debt1.16MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYFRF: Fundamental Ratings
CYFRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
31
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.650.18
+0.66%
GameStop Corp
SPY606.443.39
+0.56%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL223.831.19
+0.53%
Apple
TSLA415.11-8.96
-2.11%
Tesla
BTC.X103653.070000-2493.195300
-2.35%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

CYFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYFRF and BRPHF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYFRF and BRPHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYFRF
1D Price
Change %
CYFRF100%
+3.67%
BRPHF - CYFRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.40%
CBTTF - CYFRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-8.11%
SIEB - CYFRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.56%
SNEX - CYFRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
DMGGF - CYFRF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.38%
More

STGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STGC and FLTLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STGC and FLTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STGC
1D Price
Change %
STGC100%
N/A
FLTLF - STGC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRSCF - STGC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBTTF - STGC
4%
Poorly correlated
-8.11%
BLQC - STGC
2%
Poorly correlated
+6.60%
CYFRF - STGC
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.67%
More