CYFL
Price
$45.90
Change
+$2.00 (+4.56%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
46.63M
CYSM
Price
$13.75
Change
+$0.22 (+1.63%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
22.95M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYFL vs CYSM

Header iconCYFL vs CYSM Comparison
Open Charts CYFL vs CYSMBanner chart's image
Century Financial
Price$45.90
Change+$2.00 (+4.56%)
Volume$205
Capitalization46.63M
Community Bancorp of Santa Maria
Price$13.75
Change+$0.22 (+1.63%)
Volume$6.6K
Capitalization22.95M
CYFL vs CYSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CYFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYFL vs. CYSM commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYFL is a StrongBuy and CYSM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CYFL: $45.90 vs. CYSM: $13.75)
Brand notoriety: CYFL and CYSM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYFL: 25% vs. CYSM: 226%
Market capitalization -- CYFL: $46.63M vs. CYSM: $22.95M
CYFL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $46.63M. CYSM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCYSM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CYFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CYSM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYSM is a better buy in the long-term than CYFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYFL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYSM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CYSM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CYFL is a better buy in the short-term than CYSM.

Price Growth

CYFL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.99% price change this week, while CYSM (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CYFL($46.6M) has a higher market cap than CYSM($23M). CYSM YTD gains are higher at: 31.074 vs. CYFL (20.832). CYSM has less debt than CYFL: CYSM (4.29M) vs CYFL (8.52M). CYSM has higher revenues than CYFL: CYSM (15.6M) vs CYFL (14.4M).
CYFLCYSMCYFL / CYSM
Capitalization46.6M23M203%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.83231.07467%
P/E RatioN/A5.33-
Revenue14.4M15.6M92%
Total CashN/A4.63M-
Total Debt8.52M4.29M198%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYFL vs CYSM: Fundamental Ratings
CYFL
CYSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
532
SMR RATING
1..100
4555
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2517
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5014

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CYSM's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYFL (67). This means that CYSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYFL’s over the last 12 months.

CYFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as CYSM (32). This means that CYFL’s stock grew similarly to CYSM’s over the last 12 months.

CYFL's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CYSM (55). This means that CYFL’s stock grew similarly to CYSM’s over the last 12 months.

CYSM's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CYFL (46). This means that CYSM’s stock grew similarly to CYFL’s over the last 12 months.

CYSM's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as CYFL (25). This means that CYSM’s stock grew similarly to CYFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYFLCYSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
21%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
35%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CYFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GBERF775.593.53
+0.46%
Geberit AG
GWOX406.00N/A
N/A
Goodheart-Willcox Co. (THE), Inc.
POFCY0.12N/A
N/A
Petrofac Ltd
THNPF41.26N/A
N/A
Technip Energies NV
RDYFF0.03N/A
N/A
NEWPATH RES INC.

CYFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYFL and BMDPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYFL and BMDPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYFL
1D Price
Change %
CYFL100%
+4.56%
BMDPF - CYFL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - CYFL
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUY - CYFL
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBY - CYFL
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
CYSM - CYFL
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CYSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYSM and CBSH have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYSM and CBSH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYSM
1D Price
Change %
CYSM100%
N/A
CBSH - CYSM
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
USB - CYSM
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
ZION - CYSM
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
TRVR - CYSM
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TFC - CYSM
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
More