Advertisement
CYD vs SES
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYD is a Hold and SES is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSES’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CYD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- SES’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SES’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CYD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SES’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CYD (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +0.42% price change this week, while SES (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -4.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.98%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
SES is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (+2.17% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.22% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| CYD | SES | CYD / SES | |
| Capitalization | 1.08B | 395M | 274% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -102.15M | - |
| Gain YTD | 209.993 | -50.685 | -414% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.15 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 7.83M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 240M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 9.53M | - |
CYD | SES | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CYD's Valuation (31) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as SES (50) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CYD’s stock grew similarly to SES’s over the last 12 months.
CYD's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for SES (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CYD’s stock grew significantly faster than SES’s over the last 12 months.
CYD's SMR Rating (77) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as SES (97) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CYD’s stock grew similarly to SES’s over the last 12 months.
CYD's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as SES (52) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CYD’s stock grew similarly to SES’s over the last 12 months.
CYD's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for SES (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CYD’s stock grew significantly faster than SES’s over the last 12 months.
| CYD | SES | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | about 1 month ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
CYD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CYD and MOD have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYD and MOD's prices will move in lockstep.
SES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SES has been loosely correlated with SLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SES jumps, then SLDP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SES | 100% | +8.00% | ||
| SLDP - SES | 39% Loosely correlated | -5.77% | ||
| LKQ - SES | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| QS - SES | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
| MNRO - SES | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.32% | ||
| INVZ - SES | 27% Poorly correlated | +18.33% | ||
More | ||||