Advertisement
CYBR vs HACK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYBR is a Hold and HACK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYBR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CYBR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYBR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CYBR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CYBR (@Computer Communications) experienced а -1.26% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
CYBR is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-1.70% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
CYBR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CYBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 67% | 10 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 61% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SILJ | 23.87 | 0.94 | +4.10% |
| Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | |||
| AVNM | 72.82 | 0.46 | +0.64% |
| Avantis All International Mkts Eq ETF | |||
| PSCM | 78.21 | 0.36 | +0.46% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF | |||
| LIBD | 295.65 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | |||
| FDCF | 47.56 | -0.37 | -0.77% |
| Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF | |||
CYBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYBR has been loosely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYBR | 100% | -3.41% | ||
| CRWD - CYBR | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| ZS - CYBR | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| COIN - CYBR | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.00% | ||
| PANW - CYBR | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| CVLT - CYBR | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
More | ||||
HACK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACK | 100% | -1.30% | ||
| ZS - HACK | 82% Closely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| PANW - HACK | 80% Closely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| CRWD - HACK | 79% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| NET - HACK | 71% Closely correlated | -3.95% | ||
| CYBR - HACK | 70% Closely correlated | -3.41% | ||
More | ||||