It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYBQF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCYBQY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYBQF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYBQY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CYBQF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CYBQY (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +8.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.21%.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
CYBQF | CYBQY | CYBQF / CYBQY | |
Capitalization | 282M | 282M | 100% |
EBITDA | 73M | 73M | 100% |
Gain YTD | 25.121 | 40.135 | 63% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 4.39B | 4.39B | 100% |
Total Cash | 15.6B | 15.6B | 100% |
Total Debt | 536M | 536M | 100% |
CYBQF | CYBQY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 38 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CYBQF's Valuation (99) in the null industry is in the same range as CYBQY (99). This means that CYBQF’s stock grew similarly to CYBQY’s over the last 12 months.
CYBQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CYBQY (100). This means that CYBQF’s stock grew similarly to CYBQY’s over the last 12 months.
CYBQF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CYBQY (95). This means that CYBQF’s stock grew similarly to CYBQY’s over the last 12 months.
CYBQY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CYBQF (52). This means that CYBQY’s stock grew similarly to CYBQF’s over the last 12 months.
CYBQY's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CYBQF (100). This means that CYBQY’s stock grew similarly to CYBQF’s over the last 12 months.
CYBQF | CYBQY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago26% | 3 days ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago21% | 3 days ago56% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago35% | 3 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago25% | 3 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago23% | 3 days ago36% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 28 days ago48% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 21 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago15% | 3 days ago47% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CYBQF and CSTL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYBQF and CSTL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYBQF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CYBQF | 100% | N/A | ||
CSTL - CYBQF | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.04% | ||
CYBQY - CYBQF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CNVVF - CYBQF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CNVVY - CYBQF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
CHEOY - CYBQF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CYBQY and SLDX have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYBQY and SLDX's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYBQY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CYBQY | 100% | N/A | ||
SLDX - CYBQY | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MMSI - CYBQY | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
CYBQF - CYBQY | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CSBTF - CYBQY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CNVVY - CYBQY | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
More |