Advertisement
CXW vs TH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXW is a Hold and TH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CXW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CXW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CXW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CXW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CXW (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +1.56% price change this week, while TH (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -5.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +24.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +31.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.81%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
CXW is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
TH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+24.94% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.85% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
| CXW | TH | CXW / TH | |
| Capitalization | 2.23B | 798M | 279% |
| EBITDA | 306M | 153M | 200% |
| Gain YTD | -4.232 | -17.227 | 25% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.15 | 80.00 | 28% |
| Revenue | 1.95B | 349M | 559% |
| Total Cash | 74.5M | 34.5M | 216% |
| Total Debt | 983M | 54.8M | 1,794% |
CXW | TH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 19 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TH's Valuation (88) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as CXW (98) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that TH’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.
CXW's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TH (65) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that CXW’s stock grew somewhat faster than TH’s over the last 12 months.
TH's SMR Rating (66) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as CXW (83) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that TH’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.
CXW's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as TH (58) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that CXW’s stock grew similarly to TH’s over the last 12 months.
TH's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXW (44) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that TH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXW’s over the last 12 months.
| CXW | TH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 70% | 10 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AVEEX | 14.02 | 0.03 | +0.21% |
| Avantis® Emerging Markets Equity Instl | |||
| FETKX | 29.58 | -0.05 | -0.17% |
| Fidelity Equity Dividend Income K | |||
| GSTSX | 11.17 | -0.02 | -0.18% |
| Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth Svc | |||
| FSENX | 57.76 | -0.16 | -0.28% |
| Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio | |||
| TMCVX | 17.46 | -0.11 | -0.63% |
| Thrivent Mid Cap Value S | |||
CXW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXW has been closely correlated with GEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXW jumps, then GEO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CXW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXW | 100% | +1.76% | ||
| GEO - CXW | 82% Closely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| LOPE - CXW | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| BRC - CXW | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| GHC - CXW | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| PRSU - CXW | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
More | ||||
TH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TH and CXW have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TH and CXW's prices will move in lockstep.