CXW
Price
$20.73
Change
+$0.76 (+3.81%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.75B
10 days until earnings call
LZ
Price
$9.08
Change
+$0.04 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.52B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXW vs LZ

Header iconCXW vs LZ Comparison
Open Charts CXW vs LZBanner chart's image
CoreCivic
Price$20.73
Change+$0.76 (+3.81%)
Volume$1.11M
Capitalization1.75B
LegalZoom.com
Price$9.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.44%)
Volume$1.12M
Capitalization2.52B
CXW vs LZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXW vs. LZ commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXW is a StrongBuy and LZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CXW: $20.73 vs. LZ: $9.08)
Brand notoriety: CXW and LZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXW: 120% vs. LZ: 70%
Market capitalization -- CXW: $1.75B vs. LZ: $2.52B
CXW [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $1.75B. LZ’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $2.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXW is a better buy in the long-term than LZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LZ is a better buy in the short-term than CXW.

Price Growth

CXW (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while LZ (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +2.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXW is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

LZ is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+1.02% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LZ($2.52B) has a higher market cap than CXW($1.75B). LZ has higher P/E ratio than CXW: LZ (191.57) vs CXW (26.34). LZ YTD gains are higher at: 20.905 vs. CXW (-4.646). CXW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. LZ (60.1M). LZ has more cash in the bank: 226M vs. CXW (122M). LZ has less debt than CXW: LZ (9.02M) vs CXW (1.21B). CXW has higher revenues than LZ: CXW (1.9B) vs LZ (661M).
CXWLZCXW / LZ
Capitalization1.75B2.52B69%
EBITDA296M60.1M493%
Gain YTD-4.64620.905-22%
P/E Ratio26.34191.5714%
Revenue1.9B661M287%
Total Cash122M226M54%
Total Debt1.21B9.02M13,384%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXW: Fundamental Ratings
CXW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
82
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXWLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMPSX74.851.32
+1.80%
ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Svc
DDVIX14.390.07
+0.49%
Macquarie Value Inst
TPLIX14.550.07
+0.48%
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth I
SLCCX40.340.15
+0.37%
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth C
SDYYX18.480.06
+0.33%
SEI Dynamic Asset Allocation Y (SIMT)

CXW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXW has been closely correlated with GEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXW jumps, then GEO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXW
1D Price
Change %
CXW100%
+3.81%
GEO - CXW
84%
Closely correlated
+6.31%
LOPE - CXW
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BRC - CXW
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
LZ - CXW
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
PRSU - CXW
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
More