CXW vs LZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXW is a Buy and LZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CXW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CXW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CXW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CXW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CXW (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -0.82% price change this week, while LZ (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -10.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
CXW is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
LZ is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.75% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| CXW | LZ | CXW / LZ | |
| Capitalization | 1.75B | 2.52B | 69% |
| EBITDA | 296M | 60.1M | 493% |
| Gain YTD | -5.934 | 9.587 | -62% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.34 | 191.57 | 14% |
| Revenue | 1.9B | 661M | 287% |
| Total Cash | 122M | 226M | 54% |
| Total Debt | 1.21B | 9.02M | 13,384% |
CXW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CXW | LZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 71% | 7 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 64% | 7 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 69% | 7 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 68% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 71% | 22 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 78% |
CXW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXW has been closely correlated with GEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXW jumps, then GEO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CXW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXW | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| GEO - CXW | 79% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| LOPE - CXW | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| UTI - CXW | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.83% | ||
| ATGE - CXW | 30% Poorly correlated | -4.60% | ||
| GPN - CXW | 29% Poorly correlated | -6.65% | ||
More | ||||
LZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LZ and LTRE have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LZ and LTRE's prices will move in lockstep.