CXW
Price
$21.43
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
81 days until earnings call
LINC
Price
$15.42
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
107 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CXW vs LINC

Header iconCXW vs LINC Comparison
Open Charts CXW vs LINCBanner chart's image
CoreCivic
Price$21.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.49M
CapitalizationN/A
Lincoln Educational Services
Price$15.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$140.43K
CapitalizationN/A
CXW vs LINC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CXW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LINC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXW vs. LINC commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXW is a Hold and LINC is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (CXW: $21.43 vs. LINC: $15.42)
Brand notoriety: CXW and LINC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXW: 116% vs. LINC: 146%
Market capitalization -- CXW: $1.75B vs. LINC: $325.22M
CXW [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $1.75B. LINC’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $325.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLINC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CXW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LINC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LINC is a better buy in the long-term than CXW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LINC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LINC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CXW is a better buy in the short-term than LINC.

Price Growth

CXW (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -2.94% price change this week, while LINC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +3.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXW is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

LINC is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.54% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXW($1.75B) has a higher market cap than LINC($325M). CXW has higher P/E ratio than LINC: CXW (26.34) vs LINC (12.05). LINC YTD gains are higher at: 53.586 vs. CXW (47.488). CXW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. LINC (42.6M). CXW has more cash in the bank: 122M vs. LINC (76M). LINC has less debt than CXW: LINC (117M) vs CXW (1.21B). CXW has higher revenues than LINC: CXW (1.9B) vs LINC (378M).
CXWLINCCXW / LINC
Capitalization1.75B325M538%
EBITDA296M42.6M695%
Gain YTD47.48853.58689%
P/E Ratio26.3412.05219%
Revenue1.9B378M502%
Total Cash122M76M161%
Total Debt1.21B117M1,032%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXW vs LINC: Fundamental Ratings
CXW
LINC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8312
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
504
SMR RATING
1..100
8454
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
353
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LINC's Valuation (85) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CXW (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that LINC’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.

LINC's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXW (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that LINC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXW’s over the last 12 months.

LINC's SMR Rating (54) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CXW (84) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that LINC’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.

CXW's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as LINC (37) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CXW’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.

LINC's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CXW (35) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that LINC’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXWLINC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CXW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LINC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CXW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXW has been closely correlated with GEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXW jumps, then GEO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXW
1D Price
Change %
CXW100%
-0.42%
GEO - CXW
80%
Closely correlated
+2.47%
LOPE - CXW
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.06%
TH - CXW
37%
Loosely correlated
-5.31%
LINC - CXW
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.11%
UTI - CXW
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.89%
More

LINC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LINC has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LINC jumps, then FC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LINC
1D Price
Change %
LINC100%
-5.11%
FC - LINC
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.04%
UTI - LINC
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.89%
ALLE - LINC
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
PFMT - LINC
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
ATGE - LINC
39%
Loosely correlated
-5.60%
More