CXW
Price
$16.75
Change
-$0.33 (-1.93%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.75B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KIM
Price
$20.43
Change
-$0.16 (-0.78%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
13.84B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXW vs KIM

Header iconCXW vs KIM Comparison
Open Charts CXW vs KIMBanner chart's image
CoreCivic
Price$16.75
Change-$0.33 (-1.93%)
Volume$1.28M
Capitalization1.75B
Kimco Realty
Price$20.43
Change-$0.16 (-0.78%)
Volume$3.2M
Capitalization13.84B
CXW vs KIM Comparison Chart in %
CXW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXW vs. KIM commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXW is a Hold and KIM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CXW: $17.08 vs. KIM: $20.59)
Brand notoriety: CXW and KIM are both not notable
CXW represents the Miscellaneous Commercial Services, while KIM is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXW: 129% vs. KIM: 79%
Market capitalization -- CXW: $1.75B vs. KIM: $13.84B
CXW [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $1.75B. KIM’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $13.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.52B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $4.77B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKIM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KIM is a better buy in the long-term than CXW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KIM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KIM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CXW and KIM are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CXW (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -8.37% price change this week, while KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.23%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXW is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

KIM is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+1.67% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.44% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KIM($13.8B) has a higher market cap than CXW($1.75B). KIM has higher P/E ratio than CXW: KIM (24.61) vs CXW (16.75). KIM YTD gains are higher at: -9.007 vs. CXW (-21.435). KIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. CXW (325M). KIM has more cash in the bank: 227M vs. CXW (131M). CXW has less debt than KIM: CXW (1.02B) vs KIM (8.28B). KIM (2.1B) and CXW (2B) have equivalent revenues.
CXWKIMCXW / KIM
Capitalization1.75B13.8B13%
EBITDA325M1.41B23%
Gain YTD-21.435-9.007238%
P/E Ratio16.7524.6168%
Revenue2B2.1B95%
Total Cash131M227M58%
Total Debt1.02B8.28B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXW vs KIM: Fundamental Ratings
CXW
KIM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1167
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3649
SMR RATING
1..100
7883
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9291
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KIM's Valuation (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXW (100). This means that KIM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXW’s over the last 12 months.

CXW's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (49). This means that CXW’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

CXW's SMR Rating (78) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (83). This means that CXW’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CXW (80). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CXW (92). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXWKIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIXIX10.970.07
+0.64%
Nationwide International Index R6
TQCIX20.330.09
+0.44%
Touchstone Dividend Equity Institutional
SNTCX28.020.12
+0.43%
Steward Values Enhanced International I
THPMX15.140.02
+0.13%
Thompson MidCap
JMGFX56.93-0.10
-0.18%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth R5

CXW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXW has been closely correlated with GEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXW jumps, then GEO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXW
1D Price
Change %
CXW100%
-0.87%
GEO - CXW
73%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
ALEX - CXW
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
KIM - CXW
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
BFS - CXW
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
BRX - CXW
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
More

KIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIM has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KIM jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KIM
1D Price
Change %
KIM100%
-0.48%
FRT - KIM
86%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
BRX - KIM
86%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
KRG - KIM
86%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
AKR - KIM
83%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
IVT - KIM
81%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
More