Advertisement
CXW vs GHC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXW is a Buy and GHC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CXW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CXW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CXW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GHC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CXW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CXW (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +3.06% price change this week, while GHC (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was +2.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.37%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.38%.
Reported Earning Dates
CXW is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
GHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.32% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
@Other Consumer Specialties (-0.49% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
| CXW | GHC | CXW / GHC | |
| Capitalization | 2.31B | 5.17B | 45% |
| EBITDA | 325M | 1.36B | 24% |
| Gain YTD | -0.874 | 36.691 | -2% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.93 | 7.69 | 298% |
| Revenue | 2B | 4.84B | 41% |
| Total Cash | 131M | 1.07B | 12% |
| Total Debt | 1.02B | 1.25B | 81% |
CXW | GHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 4 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GHC's Valuation (40) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXW (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXW’s over the last 12 months.
GHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CXW (21) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.
GHC's SMR Rating (52) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CXW (79) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.
GHC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CXW (46) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.
CXW's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHC (98) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CXW’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.
| CXW | GHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 74% | 13 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
CXW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXW has been closely correlated with GEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXW jumps, then GEO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CXW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXW | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| GEO - CXW | 82% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| LOPE - CXW | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| GHC - CXW | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| PRSU - CXW | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
| UTI - CXW | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.75% | ||
More | ||||
GHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHC | 100% | +2.04% | ||
| MSA - GHC | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| LOPE - GHC | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| CASS - GHC | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| AZZ - GHC | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| ATGE - GHC | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.91% | ||
More | ||||