CXMSF
Price
$0.85
Change
-$0.02 (-2.30%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
12.33B
XYIGF
Price
$1.08
Change
+$0.03 (+2.86%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.92B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXMSF vs XYIGF

Header iconCXMSF vs XYIGF Comparison
Open Charts CXMSF vs XYIGFBanner chart's image
Cemex S.A.B de C.V
Price$0.85
Change-$0.02 (-2.30%)
Volume$754.73K
Capitalization12.33B
Xinyi Glass Holdings
Price$1.08
Change+$0.03 (+2.86%)
Volume$332
Capitalization4.92B
CXMSF vs XYIGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XYIGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXMSF vs. XYIGF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXMSF is a Hold and XYIGF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CXMSF: $0.85 vs. XYIGF: $1.08)
Brand notoriety: CXMSF and XYIGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXMSF: 89% vs. XYIGF: 6%
Market capitalization -- CXMSF: $12.33B vs. XYIGF: $4.92B
CXMSF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $12.33B. XYIGF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $4.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $74.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXMSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXYIGF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CXMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XYIGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, XYIGF is a better buy in the long-term than CXMSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXMSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XYIGF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXMSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • XYIGF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XYIGF is a better buy in the short-term than CXMSF.

Price Growth

CXMSF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while XYIGF (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.43% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXMSF($12.3B) has a higher market cap than XYIGF($4.92B). CXMSF has higher P/E ratio than XYIGF: CXMSF (14.03) vs XYIGF (10.06). CXMSF YTD gains are higher at: 60.279 vs. XYIGF (11.340).
CXMSFXYIGFCXMSF / XYIGF
Capitalization12.3B4.92B250%
EBITDA1.76BN/A-
Gain YTD60.27911.340532%
P/E Ratio14.0310.06139%
Revenue15.7BN/A-
Total Cash1.17BN/A-
Total Debt7.36BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXMSF vs XYIGF: Fundamental Ratings
CXMSF
XYIGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8895
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41100
SMR RATING
1..100
6226
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
988
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XYIGF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as CXMSF (20). This means that XYIGF’s stock grew similarly to CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

CXMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XYIGF (100). This means that CXMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than XYIGF’s over the last 12 months.

XYIGF's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXMSF (62). This means that XYIGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

CXMSF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as XYIGF (50). This means that CXMSF’s stock grew similarly to XYIGF’s over the last 12 months.

XYIGF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CXMSF (98). This means that XYIGF’s stock grew significantly faster than CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMSFXYIGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XYIGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPSI4.351.24
+39.87%
Pioneer Power Solutions
APA20.48-0.01
-0.05%
APA Corp
HIFI.X0.092791-0.000744
-0.80%
Hifi Finance cryptocurrency
HROW38.82-1.19
-2.97%
Harrow
NMG1.96-0.18
-8.41%
Nouveau Monde Graphite

CXMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CXMSF and BSND have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXMSF and BSND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXMSF
1D Price
Change %
CXMSF100%
N/A
BSND - CXMSF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBY - CXMSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.31%
XYIGF - CXMSF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
XYIGY - CXMSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
SUCEF - CXMSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

XYIGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XYIGF and WCHNF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XYIGF and WCHNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XYIGF
1D Price
Change %
XYIGF100%
+3.26%
WCHNF - XYIGF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSND - XYIGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXMSF - XYIGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBY - XYIGF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.31%
SDCVF - XYIGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More