CXMSF
Price
$0.70
Change
+$0.04 (+6.06%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
11.5B
XYIGF
Price
$0.97
Change
-$0.02 (-2.02%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
6.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXMSF vs XYIGF

Header iconCXMSF vs XYIGF Comparison
Open Charts CXMSF vs XYIGFBanner chart's image
Cemex S.A.B de C.V
Price$0.70
Change+$0.04 (+6.06%)
Volume$501.68K
Capitalization11.5B
Xinyi Glass Holdings
Price$0.97
Change-$0.02 (-2.02%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.48B
CXMSF vs XYIGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XYIGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXMSF vs. XYIGF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXMSF is a Buy and XYIGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CXMSF: $0.70 vs. XYIGF: $0.97)
Brand notoriety: CXMSF and XYIGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXMSF: 75% vs. XYIGF: 1%
Market capitalization -- CXMSF: $11.5B vs. XYIGF: $6.48B
CXMSF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $11.5B. XYIGF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $6.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXMSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXYIGF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CXMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XYIGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CXMSF and XYIGF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXMSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XYIGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXMSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • XYIGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CXMSF and XYIGF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CXMSF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while XYIGF (@Construction Materials) price change was -2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.75% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXMSF($11.5B) has a higher market cap than XYIGF($6.48B). XYIGF has higher P/E ratio than CXMSF: XYIGF (12.06) vs CXMSF (4.88). CXMSF YTD gains are higher at: 31.995 vs. XYIGF (0.010). XYIGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.2B vs. CXMSF (1.69B). XYIGF has more cash in the bank: 9.54B vs. CXMSF (471M). CXMSF has less debt than XYIGF: CXMSF (9.16B) vs XYIGF (15.5B). XYIGF has higher revenues than CXMSF: XYIGF (30.5B) vs CXMSF (16.4B).
CXMSFXYIGFCXMSF / XYIGF
Capitalization11.5B6.48B178%
EBITDA1.69B15.2B11%
Gain YTD31.9950.010310,480%
P/E Ratio4.8812.0640%
Revenue16.4B30.5B54%
Total Cash471M9.54B5%
Total Debt9.16B15.5B59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXMSF vs XYIGF: Fundamental Ratings
CXMSF
XYIGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49100
SMR RATING
1..100
6327
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4361
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9816
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XYIGF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CXMSF (19). This means that XYIGF’s stock grew similarly to CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

CXMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XYIGF (100). This means that CXMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than XYIGF’s over the last 12 months.

XYIGF's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXMSF (63). This means that XYIGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

CXMSF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as XYIGF (61). This means that CXMSF’s stock grew similarly to XYIGF’s over the last 12 months.

XYIGF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CXMSF (98). This means that XYIGF’s stock grew significantly faster than CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMSFXYIGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XYIGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDRV31.850.40
+1.27%
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF
PEZ100.260.99
+1.00%
Invesco DW Consumer Cyclicals Momt ETF
JHSC40.210.23
+0.58%
JHancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
FPE17.870.03
+0.17%
First Trust Preferred Sec & Inc ETF
ZVOL12.650.01
+0.05%
Volatility Premium Plus ETF

CXMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CXMSF and BSND have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXMSF and BSND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXMSF
1D Price
Change %
CXMSF100%
N/A
BSND - CXMSF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBY - CXMSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
XYIGF - CXMSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XYIGY - CXMSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUCEF - CXMSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

XYIGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XYIGF and WCHNF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XYIGF and WCHNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XYIGF
1D Price
Change %
XYIGF100%
N/A
WCHNF - XYIGF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSND - XYIGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXMSF - XYIGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBY - XYIGF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
SDCVF - XYIGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More