CXMSF
Price
$0.85
Change
-$0.02 (-2.30%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
12.33B
WBRBY
Price
$7.32
Change
-$0.33 (-4.31%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.06B
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXMSF vs WBRBY

Header iconCXMSF vs WBRBY Comparison
Open Charts CXMSF vs WBRBYBanner chart's image
Cemex S.A.B de C.V
Price$0.85
Change-$0.02 (-2.30%)
Volume$754.73K
Capitalization12.33B
Wienerberger Baustoffindustrie AG
Price$7.32
Change-$0.33 (-4.31%)
Volume$2.85K
Capitalization4.06B
CXMSF vs WBRBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WBRBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXMSF vs. WBRBY commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXMSF is a Hold and WBRBY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CXMSF: $0.85 vs. WBRBY: $7.32)
Brand notoriety: CXMSF and WBRBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXMSF: 89% vs. WBRBY: 23%
Market capitalization -- CXMSF: $12.33B vs. WBRBY: $4.06B
CXMSF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $12.33B. WBRBY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $4.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $74.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXMSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWBRBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CXMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WBRBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXMSF is a better buy in the long-term than WBRBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXMSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WBRBY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXMSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WBRBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WBRBY is a better buy in the short-term than CXMSF.

Price Growth

CXMSF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WBRBY (@Construction Materials) price change was +0.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

WBRBY is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.43% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXMSF($12.3B) has a higher market cap than WBRBY($4.06B). WBRBY has higher P/E ratio than CXMSF: WBRBY (18.38) vs CXMSF (14.03). CXMSF YTD gains are higher at: 60.279 vs. WBRBY (42.580).
CXMSFWBRBYCXMSF / WBRBY
Capitalization12.3B4.06B303%
EBITDA1.76BN/A-
Gain YTD60.27942.580142%
P/E Ratio14.0318.3876%
Revenue15.7BN/A-
Total Cash1.17BN/A-
Total Debt7.36BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXMSF vs WBRBY: Fundamental Ratings
CXMSF
WBRBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8828
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4147
SMR RATING
1..100
6288
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9885
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WBRBY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as CXMSF (20). This means that WBRBY’s stock grew similarly to CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

CXMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as WBRBY (47). This means that CXMSF’s stock grew similarly to WBRBY’s over the last 12 months.

CXMSF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as WBRBY (88). This means that CXMSF’s stock grew similarly to WBRBY’s over the last 12 months.

CXMSF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as WBRBY (46). This means that CXMSF’s stock grew similarly to WBRBY’s over the last 12 months.

WBRBY's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as CXMSF (98). This means that WBRBY’s stock grew similarly to CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMSFWBRBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WBRBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPSR24.58N/A
N/A
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - March
XDSQ38.91-0.03
-0.09%
Innovator US Eq Acltd ETF™ Quarterly
IPAY58.47-0.13
-0.22%
Amplify Digital Payments ETF
NUSC42.01-0.13
-0.31%
Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF
BLKC25.39-0.15
-0.60%
Invesco Aln Glxy Blkh Usr&Dctrzd Cmr ETF

CXMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CXMSF and BSND have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXMSF and BSND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXMSF
1D Price
Change %
CXMSF100%
N/A
BSND - CXMSF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBY - CXMSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.31%
XYIGF - CXMSF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
XYIGY - CXMSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
SUCEF - CXMSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WBRBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WBRBY and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WBRBY and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WBRBY
1D Price
Change %
WBRBY100%
-4.31%
HCMLY - WBRBY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
HDLMY - WBRBY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
XYIGY - WBRBY
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
WBRBF - WBRBY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXMSF - WBRBY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More