CXM
Price
$7.81
Change
-$0.02 (-0.26%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.91B
88 days until earnings call
TAPM
Price
$0.37
Change
+$0.03 (+8.82%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXM vs TAPM

Header iconCXM vs TAPM Comparison
Open Charts CXM vs TAPMBanner chart's image
Sprinklr
Price$7.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.26%)
Volume$2.5M
Capitalization1.91B
Tapinator
Price$0.37
Change+$0.03 (+8.82%)
Volume$4.9K
Capitalization1.01M
CXM vs TAPM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXM vs. TAPM commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Hold and TAPM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CXM: $7.81 vs. TAPM: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: CXM and TAPM are both not notable
CXM represents the Packaged Software, while TAPM is part of the Electronics/Appliances industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXM: 108% vs. TAPM: 112%
Market capitalization -- CXM: $1.91B vs. TAPM: $1.01M
CXM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.91B. TAPM’s [@Electronics/Appliances] market capitalization is $1.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $316.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.99B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $12.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTAPM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CXM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TAPM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TAPM is a better buy in the long-term than CXM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAPM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TAPM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAPM is a better buy in the short-term than CXM.

Price Growth

CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.61% price change this week, while TAPM (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was +8.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXM is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Electronics/Appliances (-2.44% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXM($1.91B) has a higher market cap than TAPM($1.01M). CXM YTD gains are higher at: -7.574 vs. TAPM (-30.189). CXM has more cash in the bank: 570M vs. TAPM (482K). TAPM has less debt than CXM: TAPM (302K) vs CXM (50.9M).
CXMTAPMCXM / TAPM
Capitalization1.91B1.01M189,187%
EBITDA51.7MN/A-
Gain YTD-7.574-30.18925%
P/E Ratio17.75N/A-
Revenue806MN/A-
Total Cash570M482K118,257%
Total Debt50.9M302K16,854%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TAPM: Fundamental Ratings
TAPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
95
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
3
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMTAPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NSVAX14.780.08
+0.54%
Columbia Sm Cp Val and Inflection Inst
TWRCX51.72N/A
N/A
American Century Growth C
GFVAX15.99N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Focused Value A
ALOAX19.67N/A
N/A
Alger Mid Cap Focus A
PEOPX63.86-0.19
-0.30%
BNY Mellon S&P 500 Index

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been loosely correlated with SPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then SPT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
-0.26%
SPT - CXM
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
EVCM - CXM
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
PCOR - CXM
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
CRM - CXM
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
PATH - CXM
54%
Loosely correlated
+5.90%
More

TAPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAPM and LOQPF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAPM and LOQPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAPM
1D Price
Change %
TAPM100%
N/A
LOQPF - TAPM
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXM - TAPM
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
DOCN - TAPM
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
GDDY - TAPM
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
WK - TAPM
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.10%
More