CXM
Price
$7.81
Change
-$0.02 (-0.26%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.91B
88 days until earnings call
MQ
Price
$6.15
Change
+$0.04 (+0.65%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.76B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXM vs MQ

Header iconCXM vs MQ Comparison
Open Charts CXM vs MQBanner chart's image
Sprinklr
Price$7.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.26%)
Volume$2.5M
Capitalization1.91B
Marqeta
Price$6.15
Change+$0.04 (+0.65%)
Volume$35.64K
Capitalization2.76B
CXM vs MQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXM vs. MQ commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Hold and MQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CXM: $7.81 vs. MQ: $6.15)
Brand notoriety: CXM and MQ are both not notable
CXM represents the Packaged Software, while MQ is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXM: 108% vs. MQ: 70%
Market capitalization -- CXM: $1.91B vs. MQ: $2.76B
CXM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.91B. MQ’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $316.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.68T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.99B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXM is a better buy in the long-term than MQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MQ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CXM is a better buy in the short-term than MQ.

Price Growth

CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.61% price change this week, while MQ (@Computer Communications) price change was -3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXM is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

MQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+1.14% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MQ($2.76B) has a higher market cap than CXM($1.91B). MQ has higher P/E ratio than CXM: MQ (56.80) vs CXM (17.75). MQ YTD gains are higher at: 61.214 vs. CXM (-7.574). CXM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 51.7M vs. MQ (-85.47M). MQ has more cash in the bank: 822M vs. CXM (570M). MQ has less debt than CXM: MQ (14.5M) vs CXM (50.9M). CXM has higher revenues than MQ: CXM (806M) vs MQ (553M).
CXMMQCXM / MQ
Capitalization1.91B2.76B69%
EBITDA51.7M-85.47M-60%
Gain YTD-7.57461.214-12%
P/E Ratio17.7556.8031%
Revenue806M553M146%
Total Cash570M822M69%
Total Debt50.9M14.5M351%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMMQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PNSCX63.321.15
+1.85%
Putnam Small Cap Growth C
ALLIX120.251.35
+1.14%
AB Large Cap Growth I
ICTTX15.530.12
+0.78%
ICON Health and Information Tech Inv
TOTRX11.670.03
+0.26%
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps R
FNRAX35.660.07
+0.20%
Franklin Natural Resources Adv

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been loosely correlated with SPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then SPT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
-0.26%
SPT - CXM
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
EVCM - CXM
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
PCOR - CXM
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
CRM - CXM
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
PATH - CXM
54%
Loosely correlated
+5.90%
More

MQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MQ has been loosely correlated with TDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MQ jumps, then TDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MQ
1D Price
Change %
MQ100%
-1.13%
TDC - MQ
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
EVTC - MQ
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
ALRM - MQ
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
CXM - MQ
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
U - MQ
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.76%
More