CXM
Price
$8.21
Change
-$0.19 (-2.26%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.35B
65 days until earnings call
MQ
Price
$5.88
Change
+$0.04 (+0.68%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXM vs MQ

Header iconCXM vs MQ Comparison
Open Charts CXM vs MQBanner chart's image
Sprinklr
Price$8.21
Change-$0.19 (-2.26%)
Volume$8M
Capitalization3.35B
Marqeta
Price$5.88
Change+$0.04 (+0.68%)
Volume$19.75M
Capitalization3.06B
CXM vs MQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXM vs. MQ commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Buy and MQ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CXM: $8.21 vs. MQ: $5.88)
Brand notoriety: CXM and MQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXM: 409% vs. MQ: 244%
Market capitalization -- CXM: $3.35B vs. MQ: $3.06B
CXM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.35B. MQ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CXM and MQ are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CXM and MQ are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.37% price change this week, while MQ (@Packaged Software) price change was +7.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXM is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

MQ is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXM($3.35B) has a higher market cap than MQ($3.06B). MQ YTD gains are higher at: 55.145 vs. CXM (-2.840). CXM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.4M vs. MQ (-272.27M). MQ has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. CXM (663M). MQ has less debt than CXM: MQ (16.9M) vs CXM (33.3M). CXM has higher revenues than MQ: CXM (732M) vs MQ (676M).
CXMMQCXM / MQ
Capitalization3.35B3.06B109%
EBITDA49.4M-272.27M-18%
Gain YTD-2.84055.145-5%
P/E Ratio67.67N/A-
Revenue732M676M108%
Total Cash663M1.25B53%
Total Debt33.3M16.9M197%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMMQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JAWGX73.800.65
+0.89%
Janus Henderson VIT Global Rsrch Instl
CBFAX39.490.13
+0.33%
American Funds Global Balanced 529A
NEXTX33.180.09
+0.27%
Shelton Sustainable Equity Investor
MDDRX9.720.02
+0.21%
MassMutual Diversified Value R4
TSCSX30.600.02
+0.07%
Thrivent Small Cap Stock S

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been loosely correlated with SPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then SPT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
-2.26%
SPT - CXM
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
CRM - CXM
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
EVCM - CXM
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
PATH - CXM
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
AMPL - CXM
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
More

MQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MQ has been loosely correlated with TDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MQ jumps, then TDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MQ
1D Price
Change %
MQ100%
+0.68%
TDC - MQ
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
ALRM - MQ
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
EVTC - MQ
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
CXM - MQ
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
U - MQ
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.93%
More