CXM
Price
$9.12
Change
-$0.19 (-2.04%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
98 days until earnings call
MQ
Price
$3.70
Change
-$0.19 (-4.88%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
69 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CXM vs MQ

Header iconCXM vs MQ Comparison
Open Charts CXM vs MQBanner chart's image
Sprinklr
Price$9.12
Change-$0.19 (-2.04%)
Volume$21.45K
CapitalizationN/A
Marqeta
Price$3.70
Change-$0.19 (-4.88%)
Volume$78.96K
CapitalizationN/A
CXM vs MQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
CXM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXM vs. MQ commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Hold and MQ is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CXM: $9.30 vs. MQ: $3.89)
Brand notoriety: CXM and MQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXM: 102% vs. MQ: 42%
Market capitalization -- CXM: $3.35B vs. MQ: $3.06B
CXM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.35B. MQ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MQ is a better buy in the long-term than CXM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MQ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MQ is a better buy in the short-term than CXM.

Price Growth

CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.75% price change this week, while MQ (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXM is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

MQ is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXM($3.35B) has a higher market cap than MQ($3.06B). CXM YTD gains are higher at: -22.757 vs. MQ (-44.269). CXM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.4M vs. MQ (-272.27M). MQ has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. CXM (663M). MQ has less debt than CXM: MQ (16.9M) vs CXM (33.3M). CXM has higher revenues than MQ: CXM (732M) vs MQ (676M).
CXMMQCXM / MQ
Capitalization3.35B3.06B109%
EBITDA49.4M-272.27M-18%
Gain YTD-22.757-44.26951%
P/E Ratio67.67N/A-
Revenue732M676M108%
Total Cash663M1.25B53%
Total Debt33.3M16.9M197%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMMQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CXM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been loosely correlated with EVCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then EVCM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
-1.27%
EVCM - CXM
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
AMPL - CXM
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
BIGC - CXM
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
BRZE - CXM
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
BL - CXM
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
More

MQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MQ has been loosely correlated with ALRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MQ jumps, then ALRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MQ
1D Price
Change %
MQ100%
-3.47%
ALRM - MQ
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
TDC - MQ
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
BSY - MQ
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
CXM - MQ
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
SQ - MQ
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
More