CXM
Price
$7.89
Change
+$0.02 (+0.25%)
Updated
Sep 24, 11:54 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.92B
70 days until earnings call
HUBS
Price
$517.00
Change
+$3.85 (+0.75%)
Updated
Sep 24, 12:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.04B
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXM vs HUBS

Header iconCXM vs HUBS Comparison
Open Charts CXM vs HUBSBanner chart's image
Sprinklr
Price$7.89
Change+$0.02 (+0.25%)
Volume$700
Capitalization1.92B
HUBSPOT
Price$517.00
Change+$3.85 (+0.75%)
Volume$300
Capitalization27.04B
CXM vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXM vs. HUBS commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Hold and HUBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CXM: $7.87 vs. HUBS: $513.14)
Brand notoriety: CXM and HUBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXM: 75% vs. HUBS: 72%
Market capitalization -- CXM: $1.92B vs. HUBS: $27.04B
CXM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.92B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $27.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $311.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXM is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than CXM.

Price Growth

CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.03% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +150.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXM is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.81% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($27B) has a higher market cap than CXM($1.92B). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than CXM: HUBS (7023.44) vs CXM (17.89). CXM YTD gains are higher at: -6.864 vs. HUBS (-26.354). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 126M vs. CXM (63.3M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. CXM (474M). CXM has less debt than HUBS: CXM (48.2M) vs HUBS (281M). HUBS has higher revenues than CXM: HUBS (2.85B) vs CXM (821M).
CXMHUBSCXM / HUBS
Capitalization1.92B27B7%
EBITDA63.3M126M50%
Gain YTD-6.864-26.35426%
P/E Ratio17.897023.440%
Revenue821M2.85B29%
Total Cash474M1.67B28%
Total Debt48.2M281M17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GREIX12.050.09
+0.75%
Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Ins
FHJVX45.75N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Europe M
LGCRX19.62-0.10
-0.51%
Lord Abbett Global Equity R3
PNAIX84.64-0.59
-0.69%
T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities-I
TSNRX22.15-0.35
-1.56%
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Gr R6

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been loosely correlated with SPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then SPT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
-0.38%
SPT - CXM
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.35%
HUBS - CXM
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
EVCM - CXM
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.51%
PCOR - CXM
56%
Loosely correlated
+5.01%
BRZE - CXM
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
-1.88%
CRM - HUBS
72%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
TEAM - HUBS
71%
Closely correlated
-2.90%
NOW - HUBS
70%
Closely correlated
-2.12%
S - HUBS
67%
Closely correlated
-3.85%
FRSH - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
More