CXM vs HUBS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Hold and HUBS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CXM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CXM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CXM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CXM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.95% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +4.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
CXM is expected to report earnings on Jun 10, 2025.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+1.84% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CXM | HUBS | CXM / HUBS | |
| Capitalization | 3.35B | 32.3B | 10% |
| EBITDA | 49.4M | -81.23M | -61% |
| Gain YTD | -15.976 | -22.544 | 71% |
| P/E Ratio | 67.67 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 732M | 2.17B | 34% |
| Total Cash | 663M | 1.39B | 48% |
| Total Debt | 33.3M | 788M | 4% |
HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CXM | HUBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 71% | 25 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 79% |
CXM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been loosely correlated with EVCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then EVCM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CXM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXM | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| EVCM - CXM | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| AMPL - CXM | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| PCOR - CXM | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.52% | ||
| HUBS - CXM | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| BRZE - CXM | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.78% | ||
More | ||||
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been loosely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.08% | ||
| SHOP - HUBS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| BRZE - HUBS | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| NET - HUBS | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
More | ||||