CXBMF
Price
$1.52
Change
+$0.04 (+2.70%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
DPMLF
Price
$8.88
Change
-$0.04 (-0.45%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
90 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CXBMF vs DPMLF

Header iconCXBMF vs DPMLF Comparison
Open Charts CXBMF vs DPMLFBanner chart's image
Calibre Mining
Price$1.52
Change+$0.04 (+2.70%)
Volume$396.26K
CapitalizationN/A
Dundee Precious Metals
Price$8.88
Change-$0.04 (-0.45%)
Volume$20.39K
CapitalizationN/A
CXBMF vs DPMLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DPMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXBMF vs. DPMLF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXBMF is a Hold and DPMLF is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CXBMF: $1.52 vs. DPMLF: $8.88)
Brand notoriety: CXBMF and DPMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXBMF: 87% vs. DPMLF: 86%
Market capitalization -- CXBMF: $586.8M vs. DPMLF: $1.3B
CXBMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $586.8M. DPMLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXBMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDPMLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CXBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DPMLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DPMLF is a better buy in the long-term than CXBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPMLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DPMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CXBMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.64% price change this week, while DPMLF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

DPMLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.47% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPMLF($1.31B) has a higher market cap than CXBMF($587M). DPMLF has higher P/E ratio than CXBMF: DPMLF (23.15) vs CXBMF (12.59). CXBMF YTD gains are higher at: 46.538 vs. DPMLF (40.053). DPMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 175M vs. CXBMF (137M). DPMLF has more cash in the bank: 420M vs. CXBMF (58.3M). DPMLF has less debt than CXBMF: DPMLF (14.6M) vs CXBMF (15.9M). DPMLF has higher revenues than CXBMF: DPMLF (572M) vs CXBMF (429M).
CXBMFDPMLFCXBMF / DPMLF
Capitalization587M1.31B45%
EBITDA137M175M78%
Gain YTD46.53840.053116%
P/E Ratio12.5923.1554%
Revenue429M572M75%
Total Cash58.3M420M14%
Total Debt15.9M14.6M109%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXBMF vs DPMLF: Fundamental Ratings
CXBMF
DPMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5254
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5919
SMR RATING
1..100
6883
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6156
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
459
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPMLF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXBMF (75). This means that DPMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXBMF’s over the last 12 months.

DPMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXBMF (59). This means that DPMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXBMF’s over the last 12 months.

CXBMF's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as DPMLF (83). This means that CXBMF’s stock grew similarly to DPMLF’s over the last 12 months.

DPMLF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CXBMF (61). This means that DPMLF’s stock grew similarly to CXBMF’s over the last 12 months.

CXBMF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPMLF (59). This means that CXBMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DPMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CXBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXBMF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXBMF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXBMF
1D Price
Change %
CXBMF100%
+2.97%
TORXF - CXBMF
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
KNTNF - CXBMF
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
WDOFF - CXBMF
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LUGDF - CXBMF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.53%
DPMLF - CXBMF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
More

DPMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPMLF has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPMLF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPMLF
1D Price
Change %
DPMLF100%
-0.45%
AEM - DPMLF
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
AGI - DPMLF
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
GOLD - DPMLF
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
PAAS - DPMLF
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
KGC - DPMLF
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
More