CXBMF
Price
$2.17
Change
-$0.04 (-1.81%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
586.8M
DDEJF
Price
$1.87
Change
-$0.11 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
85.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXBMF vs DDEJF

Header iconCXBMF vs DDEJF Comparison
Open Charts CXBMF vs DDEJFBanner chart's image
Calibre Mining
Price$2.17
Change-$0.04 (-1.81%)
Volume$1.43M
Capitalization586.8M
Dundee
Price$1.87
Change-$0.11 (-5.56%)
Volume$300
Capitalization85.39M
CXBMF vs DDEJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DDEJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXBMF vs. DDEJF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXBMF is a Hold and DDEJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CXBMF: $2.17 vs. DDEJF: $1.87)
Brand notoriety: CXBMF and DDEJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXBMF: 194% vs. DDEJF: 1%
Market capitalization -- CXBMF: $586.8M vs. DDEJF: $85.39M
CXBMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $586.8M. DDEJF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $85.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXBMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDDEJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DDEJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DDEJF is a better buy in the long-term than CXBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXBMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DDEJF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXBMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • DDEJF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CXBMF is a better buy in the short-term than DDEJF.

Price Growth

CXBMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DDEJF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXBMF($587M) has a higher market cap than DDEJF($85.4M). CXBMF has higher P/E ratio than DDEJF: CXBMF (12.59) vs DDEJF (4.43). DDEJF YTD gains are higher at: 88.889 vs. CXBMF (45.638). CXBMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 137M vs. DDEJF (-18.48M). DDEJF has more cash in the bank: 158M vs. CXBMF (58.3M). DDEJF has less debt than CXBMF: DDEJF (8.64M) vs CXBMF (15.9M). CXBMF has higher revenues than DDEJF: CXBMF (429M) vs DDEJF (7.19M).
CXBMFDDEJFCXBMF / DDEJF
Capitalization587M85.4M687%
EBITDA137M-18.48M-741%
Gain YTD45.63888.88951%
P/E Ratio12.594.43284%
Revenue429M7.19M5,965%
Total Cash58.3M158M37%
Total Debt15.9M8.64M184%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXBMF vs DDEJF: Fundamental Ratings
CXBMF
DDEJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5080
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5436
SMR RATING
1..100
7936
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
483
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DDEJF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as CXBMF (72). This means that DDEJF’s stock grew similarly to CXBMF’s over the last 12 months.

DDEJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CXBMF (54). This means that DDEJF’s stock grew similarly to CXBMF’s over the last 12 months.

DDEJF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXBMF (79). This means that DDEJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXBMF’s over the last 12 months.

DDEJF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CXBMF (45). This means that DDEJF’s stock grew similarly to CXBMF’s over the last 12 months.

CXBMF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DDEJF (83). This means that CXBMF’s stock grew significantly faster than DDEJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXBMFDDEJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DDEJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AZNCX9.670.03
+0.31%
Virtus Income & Growth C
DGEZX13.010.04
+0.31%
Destinations Equity Income Z
ILESX17.990.01
+0.06%
FI Instl Grp US Lrg Cp Eq Env & Scl Val
FLIIX12.03N/A
N/A
First Sentier Global Listed Infras I
KNPAX127.26-1.56
-1.21%
Kinetics Paradigm Adv A

CXBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXBMF has been closely correlated with EQX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXBMF jumps, then EQX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXBMF
1D Price
Change %
CXBMF100%
N/A
EQX - CXBMF
66%
Closely correlated
-3.89%
AGI - CXBMF
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
WPM - CXBMF
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.21%
ARMN - CXBMF
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.53%
BTG - CXBMF
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.29%
More

DDEJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DDEJF and HWAUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DDEJF and HWAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DDEJF
1D Price
Change %
DDEJF100%
-5.56%
HWAUF - DDEJF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.42%
RGCCF - DDEJF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.07%
TRX - DDEJF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
CNRIF - DDEJF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXBMF - DDEJF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More