CX
Price
$9.65
Change
-$0.05 (-0.52%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
14B
10 days until earnings call
LOMA
Price
$7.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
999.41M
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CX vs LOMA

Header iconCX vs LOMA Comparison
Open Charts CX vs LOMABanner chart's image
Cemex SAB de CV
Price$9.65
Change-$0.05 (-0.52%)
Volume$23.99M
Capitalization14B
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
Price$7.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$326.8K
Capitalization999.41M
CX vs LOMA Comparison Chart in %
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. LOMA commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a Hold and LOMA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CX: $9.65 vs. LOMA: $7.85)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. LOMA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 238% vs. LOMA: 43%
Market capitalization -- CX: $14B vs. LOMA: $999.41M
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $14B. LOMA’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $999.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $78.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LOMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CX is a better buy in the long-term than LOMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LOMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LOMA is a better buy in the short-term than CX.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а +5.46% price change this week, while LOMA (@Construction Materials) price change was +1.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.11% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($14B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($999M). LOMA has higher P/E ratio than CX: LOMA (24.09) vs CX (15.92). CX YTD gains are higher at: 72.648 vs. LOMA (-34.255). LOMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 164B vs. CX (1.76B). LOMA has more cash in the bank: 15.9B vs. CX (330M). CX has less debt than LOMA: CX (7.36B) vs LOMA (275B). LOMA has higher revenues than CX: LOMA (667B) vs CX (15.7B).
CXLOMACX / LOMA
Capitalization14B999M1,401%
EBITDA1.76B164B1%
Gain YTD72.648-34.255-212%
P/E Ratio15.9224.0966%
Revenue15.7B667B2%
Total Cash330M15.9B2%
Total Debt7.36B275B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX vs LOMA: Fundamental Ratings
CX
LOMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
916
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4252
SMR RATING
1..100
6379
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4064
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8914
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (21). This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (52). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

CX's SMR Rating (63) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (79). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (64). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for CX (89). This means that LOMA’s stock grew significantly faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXLOMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSTI20.740.10
+0.48%
Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF
TSEP23.34N/A
+0.02%
FT Vest Emerging Mkts Buffr ETF - Sep
CRED21.17N/A
N/A
Columbia Research Enhanced Rl Estt ETF
VTC78.82-0.03
-0.04%
Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF
NCZ13.81-0.09
-0.65%
Virtus Convertible & Income Fund II

CX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CX
1D Price
Change %
CX100%
-0.52%
CRH - CX
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
EXP - CX
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
VMC - CX
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
MLM - CX
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
LOMA - CX
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
N/A
CX - LOMA
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
KNF - LOMA
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
CRH - LOMA
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
HCMLY - LOMA
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
JHX - LOMA
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
More