CX
Price
$5.65
Change
+$0.03 (+0.53%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
45 days until earnings call
EXP
Price
$248.30
Change
-$1.90 (-0.76%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
31 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CX vs EXP

Header iconCX vs EXP Comparison
Open Charts CX vs EXPBanner chart's image
Cemex SAB de CV
Price$5.65
Change+$0.03 (+0.53%)
Volume$14.02M
CapitalizationN/A
Eagle Materials
Price$248.30
Change-$1.90 (-0.76%)
Volume$651.95K
CapitalizationN/A
CX vs EXP Comparison Chart
Loading...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EXP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. EXP commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a Hold and EXP is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CX: $5.65 vs. EXP: $248.30)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. EXP: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 129% vs. EXP: 220%
Market capitalization -- CX: $13.14B vs. EXP: $9.3B
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $13.14B. EXP’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $9.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEXP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EXP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, EXP is a better buy in the long-term than CX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EXP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EXP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EXP is a better buy in the short-term than CX.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а +0.89% price change this week, while EXP (@Construction Materials) price change was -9.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -2.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

EXP is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-2.72% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($13.1B) has a higher market cap than EXP($9.3B). CX has higher P/E ratio than EXP: CX (73.74) vs EXP (19.03). EXP YTD gains are higher at: 22.892 vs. CX (-26.346). CX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.72B vs. EXP (829M). CX has more cash in the bank: 533M vs. EXP (48.9M). EXP has less debt than CX: EXP (1.06B) vs CX (9.16B). CX has higher revenues than EXP: CX (17B) vs EXP (2.25B).
CXEXPCX / EXP
Capitalization13.1B9.3B141%
EBITDA1.72B829M207%
Gain YTD-26.34622.892-115%
P/E Ratio73.7419.03388%
Revenue17B2.25B755%
Total Cash533M48.9M1,090%
Total Debt9.16B1.06B863%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX vs EXP: Fundamental Ratings
CX
EXP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6410
SMR RATING
1..100
8527
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6160
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2554
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CX's Valuation (18) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as EXP (19). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CX (64). This means that EXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's SMR Rating (27) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CX (85). This means that EXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (61). This means that EXP’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as EXP (54). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXEXP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EXP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

CX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CX
1D Price
Change %
CX100%
+0.53%
EXP - CX
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
CRH - CX
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
MLM - CX
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
VMC - CX
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
BCC - CX
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
More

EXP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXP has been closely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EXP jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EXP
1D Price
Change %
EXP100%
-0.76%
MLM - EXP
76%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
VMC - EXP
74%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
CRH - EXP
70%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
BCC - EXP
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
USLM - EXP
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
More