CX
Price
$10.19
Change
-$0.17 (-1.64%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
14.78B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EXP
Price
$202.91
Change
-$4.39 (-2.12%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.51B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CX vs EXP

Header iconCX vs EXP Comparison
Open Charts CX vs EXPBanner chart's image
Cemex SAB de CV
Price$10.19
Change-$0.17 (-1.64%)
Volume$11.93M
Capitalization14.78B
Eagle Materials
Price$202.91
Change-$4.39 (-2.12%)
Volume$482.66K
Capitalization6.51B
CX vs EXP Comparison Chart in %
CX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EXP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. EXP commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a StrongBuy and EXP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CX: $10.36 vs. EXP: $207.30)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. EXP: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 53% vs. EXP: 149%
Market capitalization -- CX: $14.78B vs. EXP: $6.51B
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $14.78B. EXP’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $6.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $74.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $10.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEXP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EXP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CX is a better buy in the long-term than EXP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EXP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EXP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CX and EXP are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while EXP (@Construction Materials) price change was +0.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

EXP is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.81% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($14.8B) has a higher market cap than EXP($6.51B). EXP has higher P/E ratio than CX: EXP (14.95) vs CX (11.25). CX YTD gains are higher at: 85.351 vs. EXP (-15.695). CX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. EXP (783M). EXP has less debt than CX: EXP (1.35B) vs CX (7.36B). CX has higher revenues than EXP: CX (15.7B) vs EXP (2.29B).
CXEXPCX / EXP
Capitalization14.8B6.51B227%
EBITDA1.76B783M225%
Gain YTD85.351-15.695-544%
P/E Ratio11.2514.9575%
Revenue15.7B2.29B686%
Total Cash330MN/A-
Total Debt7.36B1.35B545%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX vs EXP: Fundamental Ratings
CX
EXP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1764
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4146
SMR RATING
1..100
6230
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3881
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9681
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EXP's Valuation (20) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (21). This means that EXP’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as EXP (46). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's SMR Rating (30) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (62). This means that EXP’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EXP (81). This means that CX’s stock grew somewhat faster than EXP’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (96). This means that EXP’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXEXP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EXP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAGG43.28-0.01
-0.01%
T. Rowe Price QM US Bond ETF
BENJ51.56-0.01
-0.01%
Horizon Landmark ETF
FPFD22.01-0.03
-0.14%
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Inc ETF
WCLD35.78-0.15
-0.42%
WisdomTree Cloud Computing ETF
DZZ3.33-0.57
-14.62%
DB Gold Double Short ETN

CX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CX
1D Price
Change %
CX100%
-1.43%
CRH - CX
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
EXP - CX
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
VMC - CX
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.00%
KNF - CX
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
MLM - CX
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
More

EXP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXP has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EXP jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EXP
1D Price
Change %
EXP100%
+0.78%
VMC - EXP
73%
Closely correlated
-0.00%
BCC - EXP
71%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
MLM - EXP
70%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
CRH - EXP
66%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
KNF - EXP
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
More