CX
Price
$8.41
Change
+$0.16 (+1.94%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
13.14B
93 days until earnings call
EXP
Price
$226.23
Change
+$6.19 (+2.81%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.3B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CX vs EXP

Header iconCX vs EXP Comparison
Open Charts CX vs EXPBanner chart's image
Cemex SAB de CV
Price$8.41
Change+$0.16 (+1.94%)
Volume$9.95M
Capitalization13.14B
Eagle Materials
Price$226.23
Change+$6.19 (+2.81%)
Volume$345.86K
Capitalization9.3B
CX vs EXP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EXP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. EXP commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a Buy and EXP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CX: $8.41 vs. EXP: $226.23)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. EXP: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 78% vs. EXP: 78%
Market capitalization -- CX: $13.14B vs. EXP: $9.3B
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $13.14B. EXP’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $9.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEXP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EXP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, EXP is a better buy in the long-term than CX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EXP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EXP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EXP is a better buy in the short-term than CX.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а +10.37% price change this week, while EXP (@Construction Materials) price change was +5.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

EXP is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.18% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($13.1B) has a higher market cap than EXP($9.3B). CX has higher P/E ratio than EXP: CX (73.74) vs EXP (19.03). CX YTD gains are higher at: 50.111 vs. EXP (-8.095). CX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.72B vs. EXP (829M). CX has more cash in the bank: 533M vs. EXP (48.9M). EXP has less debt than CX: EXP (1.06B) vs CX (9.16B). CX has higher revenues than EXP: CX (17B) vs EXP (2.25B).
CXEXPCX / EXP
Capitalization13.1B9.3B141%
EBITDA1.72B829M207%
Gain YTD50.111-8.095-619%
P/E Ratio73.7419.03388%
Revenue17B2.25B755%
Total Cash533M48.9M1,090%
Total Debt9.16B1.06B863%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX vs EXP: Fundamental Ratings
CX
EXP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4581
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4233
SMR RATING
1..100
6429
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9861
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
721

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CX's Valuation (19) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as EXP (19). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (42). This means that EXP’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's SMR Rating (29) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CX (64). This means that EXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as EXP (54). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CX (98). This means that EXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXEXP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EXP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BXSY13.850.17
+1.24%
Bexil Investment Trust
PJAN44.750.16
+0.36%
Innovator US Equity Power Buff ETF™ Jan
SNPV33.26N/A
N/A
Xtrackers S&P 500 Value Scrd & Scrn ETF
JNEU28.62N/A
N/A
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncJunETF
MVPA34.62-0.17
-0.49%
Miller Value Ptnrs Appreciation ETF

CX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CX
1D Price
Change %
CX100%
+1.94%
CRH - CX
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.97%
EXP - CX
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.81%
MLM - CX
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VMC - CX
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
KNF - CX
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
More

EXP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXP has been closely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EXP jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EXP
1D Price
Change %
EXP100%
+2.81%
MLM - EXP
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
VMC - EXP
75%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
CRH - EXP
72%
Closely correlated
+2.97%
BCC - EXP
71%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
KNF - EXP
69%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
More