CWYUF
Price
$19.09
Change
+$0.17 (+0.90%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.25B
IIPZF
Price
$9.69
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWYUF vs IIPZF

Header iconCWYUF vs IIPZF Comparison
Open Charts CWYUF vs IIPZFBanner chart's image
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$19.09
Change+$0.17 (+0.90%)
Volume$8.26K
Capitalization3.25B
InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$9.69
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$133
Capitalization1.34B
CWYUF vs IIPZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWYUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IIPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWYUF vs. IIPZF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWYUF is a Hold and IIPZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CWYUF: $19.09 vs. IIPZF: $9.69)
Brand notoriety: CWYUF and IIPZF are both not notable
CWYUF represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while IIPZF is part of the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWYUF: 32% vs. IIPZF: 5%
Market capitalization -- CWYUF: $3.25B vs. IIPZF: $1.34B
CWYUF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.25B. IIPZF’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $27.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.33B. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWYUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIIPZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CWYUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IIPZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CWYUF and IIPZF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWYUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IIPZF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWYUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IIPZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IIPZF is a better buy in the short-term than CWYUF.

Price Growth

CWYUF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -1.69% price change this week, while IIPZF (@Media Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.63%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.91% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Media Conglomerates (-1.53% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWYUF($3.25B) has a higher market cap than IIPZF($1.34B). IIPZF has higher P/E ratio than CWYUF: IIPZF (52.21) vs CWYUF (19.65). IIPZF YTD gains are higher at: 36.322 vs. CWYUF (11.965). CWYUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 473M vs. IIPZF (-123.94M). CWYUF has more cash in the bank: 33.8M vs. IIPZF (3.45M). IIPZF has less debt than CWYUF: IIPZF (1.73B) vs CWYUF (5.14B). CWYUF has higher revenues than IIPZF: CWYUF (926M) vs IIPZF (248M).
CWYUFIIPZFCWYUF / IIPZF
Capitalization3.25B1.34B243%
EBITDA473M-123.94M-382%
Gain YTD11.96536.32233%
P/E Ratio19.6552.2138%
Revenue926M248M373%
Total Cash33.8M3.45M979%
Total Debt5.14B1.73B297%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWYUF vs IIPZF: Fundamental Ratings
CWYUF
IIPZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5134
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100
SMR RATING
1..100
8695
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
277
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CWYUF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as IIPZF (27). This means that CWYUF’s stock grew similarly to IIPZF’s over the last 12 months.

CWYUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as IIPZF (100). This means that CWYUF’s stock grew similarly to IIPZF’s over the last 12 months.

CWYUF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as IIPZF (95). This means that CWYUF’s stock grew similarly to IIPZF’s over the last 12 months.

IIPZF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CWYUF (57). This means that IIPZF’s stock grew similarly to CWYUF’s over the last 12 months.

IIPZF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as CWYUF (27). This means that IIPZF’s stock grew similarly to CWYUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWYUFIIPZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWYUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IIPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGIX36.310.11
+0.31%
KraneShares Artfcl Intllgnc and Tech ETF
PML7.760.01
+0.13%
PIMCO Municipal Income FUND II
SCIO20.720.01
+0.05%
First Trust Structured Crd Inc Opp ETF
JLQD42.37N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
MQT10.01-0.05
-0.50%
Blackrock Muni Yield Quality Fund II

CWYUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWYUF has been loosely correlated with RIOCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWYUF jumps, then RIOCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWYUF
1D Price
Change %
CWYUF100%
+0.90%
RIOCF - CWYUF
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
CDPYF - CWYUF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
NWHUF - CWYUF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DREUF - CWYUF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
IIPZF - CWYUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IIPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IIPZF and BOWFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IIPZF and BOWFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IIPZF
1D Price
Change %
IIPZF100%
N/A
BOWFF - IIPZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
PPRQF - IIPZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.98%
RSHPF - IIPZF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RIOCF - IIPZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
CWYUF - IIPZF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
More