CWYUF
Price
$18.93
Change
+$0.04 (+0.21%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.2B
DBMXF
Price
$0.44
Change
-$0.01 (-2.22%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Capitalization
479.92M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWYUF vs DBMXF

Header iconCWYUF vs DBMXF Comparison
Open Charts CWYUF vs DBMXFBanner chart's image
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$18.93
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
Volume$89.43K
Capitalization3.2B
Deutsche Bank Mexico SA
Price$0.44
Change-$0.01 (-2.22%)
Volume$110
Capitalization479.92M
CWYUF vs DBMXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWYUF vs. DBMXF commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWYUF is a Hold and DBMXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CWYUF: $18.93 vs. DBMXF: $0.44)
Brand notoriety: CWYUF and DBMXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWYUF: 348% vs. DBMXF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CWYUF: $3.2B vs. DBMXF: $479.92M
CWYUF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.2B. DBMXF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $479.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWYUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDBMXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CWYUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DBMXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CWYUF is a better buy in the long-term than DBMXF.

Price Growth

CWYUF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +0.42% price change this week, while DBMXF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.26% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWYUF($3.2B) has a higher market cap than DBMXF($480M). CWYUF has higher P/E ratio than DBMXF: CWYUF (13.83) vs DBMXF (8.08). CWYUF YTD gains are higher at: 11.026 vs. DBMXF (0.000). DBMXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.01B vs. CWYUF (541M). DBMXF has more cash in the bank: 525M vs. CWYUF (32.6M). DBMXF has less debt than CWYUF: DBMXF (4.42B) vs CWYUF (4.96B). DBMXF has higher revenues than CWYUF: DBMXF (5B) vs CWYUF (812M).
CWYUFDBMXFCWYUF / DBMXF
Capitalization3.2B480M667%
EBITDA541M2.01B27%
Gain YTD11.0260.000-
P/E Ratio13.838.08171%
Revenue812M5B16%
Total Cash32.6M525M6%
Total Debt4.96B4.42B112%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWYUF vs DBMXF: Fundamental Ratings
CWYUF
DBMXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6766
SMR RATING
1..100
8486
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4873
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
155
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DBMXF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as CWYUF (34). This means that DBMXF’s stock grew similarly to CWYUF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as CWYUF (67). This means that DBMXF’s stock grew similarly to CWYUF’s over the last 12 months.

CWYUF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as DBMXF (86). This means that CWYUF’s stock grew similarly to DBMXF’s over the last 12 months.

CWYUF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as DBMXF (73). This means that CWYUF’s stock grew similarly to DBMXF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMXF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as CWYUF (15). This means that DBMXF’s stock grew similarly to CWYUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ECF9.950.17
+1.74%
Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd
GOLY29.660.11
+0.37%
Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF
NMZ10.27-0.03
-0.33%
Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund
ZTR6.12-0.02
-0.33%
Virtus Total Return Fund
IWV339.06-4.04
-1.18%
iShares Russell 3000 ETF

CWYUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWYUF has been loosely correlated with RIOCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWYUF jumps, then RIOCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWYUF
1D Price
Change %
CWYUF100%
N/A
RIOCF - CWYUF
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
CDPYF - CWYUF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
APYRF - CWYUF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
HRUFF - CWYUF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
BTLCY - CWYUF
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.17%
More

DBMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBMXF has been loosely correlated with PRLEQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DBMXF jumps, then PRLEQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBMXF
1D Price
Change %
DBMXF100%
N/A
PRLEQ - DBMXF
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CPAMF - DBMXF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDPYF - DBMXF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
BYLOF - DBMXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWYUF - DBMXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More