CWYUF
Price
$18.61
Change
-$0.51 (-2.67%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.18B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DBMBF
Price
$1.66
Change
+$0.09 (+5.73%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.37B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWYUF vs DBMBF

Header iconCWYUF vs DBMBF Comparison
Open Charts CWYUF vs DBMBFBanner chart's image
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$18.61
Change-$0.51 (-2.67%)
Volume$45.33K
Capitalization3.18B
Deutsche Bank Mexico SA
Price$1.66
Change+$0.09 (+5.73%)
Volume$3.4K
Capitalization1.37B
CWYUF vs DBMBF Comparison Chart in %
CWYUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DBMBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWYUF vs. DBMBF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWYUF is a Hold and DBMBF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CWYUF: $18.61 vs. DBMBF: $1.66)
Brand notoriety: CWYUF and DBMBF are both not notable
CWYUF represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while DBMBF is part of the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWYUF: 534% vs. DBMBF: 23%
Market capitalization -- CWYUF: $3.18B vs. DBMBF: $1.37B
CWYUF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.18B. DBMBF’s [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] market capitalization is $1.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry ranges from $115.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.11B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry is $8.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWYUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDBMBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CWYUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DBMBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CWYUF and DBMBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWYUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DBMBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWYUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • DBMBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DBMBF is a better buy in the short-term than CWYUF.

Price Growth

CWYUF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.96% price change this week, while DBMBF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was +5.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.33% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (-2.27% weekly)

Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWYUF($3.18B) has a higher market cap than DBMBF($1.37B). DBMBF has higher P/E ratio than CWYUF: DBMBF (95.05) vs CWYUF (17.01). DBMBF YTD gains are higher at: 12.162 vs. CWYUF (9.150). DBMBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.76B vs. CWYUF (473M). DBMBF has more cash in the bank: 3.62B vs. CWYUF (33.8M). CWYUF has less debt than DBMBF: CWYUF (5.14B) vs DBMBF (22.6B). DBMBF has higher revenues than CWYUF: DBMBF (5B) vs CWYUF (926M).
CWYUFDBMBFCWYUF / DBMBF
Capitalization3.18B1.37B231%
EBITDA473M5.76B8%
Gain YTD9.15012.16275%
P/E Ratio17.0195.0518%
Revenue926M5B19%
Total Cash33.8M3.62B1%
Total Debt5.14B22.6B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWYUF vs DBMBF: Fundamental Ratings
CWYUF
DBMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1428
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8067
SMR RATING
1..100
8568
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
291
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DBMBF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CWYUF (19). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew similarly to CWYUF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as CWYUF (80). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew similarly to CWYUF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CWYUF (85). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew similarly to CWYUF’s over the last 12 months.

CWYUF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as DBMBF (58). This means that CWYUF’s stock grew similarly to DBMBF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CWYUF (29). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew similarly to CWYUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWYUFDBMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWYUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DBMBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HILYX25.24-0.10
-0.39%
Hartford International Value Y
ICEVX47.65-0.31
-0.65%
NYLI Epoch International Choice Class A
GFVAX14.01-0.20
-1.41%
Goldman Sachs Focused Value A
PORTX63.09-0.92
-1.44%
Trillium ESG Global Equity Investor
SASMX36.62-1.45
-3.81%
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth A

CWYUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWYUF has been loosely correlated with RIOCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWYUF jumps, then RIOCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWYUF
1D Price
Change %
CWYUF100%
-2.67%
RIOCF - CWYUF
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.16%
NXRT - CWYUF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
LXP - CWYUF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
PLYM - CWYUF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
IRT - CWYUF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
More

DBMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBMBF and CCPPF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBMBF and CCPPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBMBF
1D Price
Change %
DBMBF100%
N/A
CCPPF - DBMBF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYLOF - DBMBF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDPYF - DBMBF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
CPAMF - DBMBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWYUF - DBMBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%