CWXZF
Price
$6.71
Change
-$0.10 (-1.47%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
591.35M
EENEF
Price
$8.27
Change
+$0.23 (+2.86%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWXZF vs EENEF

Header iconCWXZF vs EENEF Comparison
Open Charts CWXZF vs EENEFBanner chart's image
Doman Building Materials Group
Price$6.71
Change-$0.10 (-1.47%)
Volume$2.52K
Capitalization591.35M
RS GROUP
Price$8.27
Change+$0.23 (+2.86%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.53B
CWXZF vs EENEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWXZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWXZF vs. EENEF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWXZF is a Hold and EENEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CWXZF: $6.71 vs. EENEF: $8.27)
Brand notoriety: CWXZF and EENEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronics Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWXZF: 40% vs. EENEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CWXZF: $591.35M vs. EENEF: $3.53B
CWXZF [@Electronics Distributors] is valued at $591.35M. EENEF’s [@Electronics Distributors] market capitalization is $3.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics Distributors] industry ranges from $54.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics Distributors] industry is $7.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWXZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEENEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CWXZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EENEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CWXZF is a better buy in the long-term than EENEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWXZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CWXZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CWXZF (@Electronics Distributors) experienced а -5.51% price change this week, while EENEF (@Electronics Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronics Distributors (-0.10% weekly)

Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EENEF($3.53B) has a higher market cap than CWXZF($591M). EENEF has higher P/E ratio than CWXZF: EENEF (18.82) vs CWXZF (10.92). CWXZF YTD gains are higher at: 13.905 vs. EENEF (-9.418). EENEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 320M vs. CWXZF (247M). EENEF has more cash in the bank: 148M vs. CWXZF (15.2M). EENEF has less debt than CWXZF: EENEF (512M) vs CWXZF (1.2B). CWXZF (3.05B) and EENEF (2.9B) have equivalent revenues.
CWXZFEENEFCWXZF / EENEF
Capitalization591M3.53B17%
EBITDA247M320M77%
Gain YTD13.905-9.418-148%
P/E Ratio10.9218.8258%
Revenue3.05B2.9B105%
Total Cash15.2M148M10%
Total Debt1.2B512M235%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWXZF vs EENEF: Fundamental Ratings
CWXZF
EENEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7640
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74100
SMR RATING
1..100
6377
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4349
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CWXZF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EENEF (84). This means that CWXZF’s stock grew significantly faster than EENEF’s over the last 12 months.

CWXZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as EENEF (100). This means that CWXZF’s stock grew similarly to EENEF’s over the last 12 months.

CWXZF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as EENEF (77). This means that CWXZF’s stock grew similarly to EENEF’s over the last 12 months.

CWXZF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as EENEF (58). This means that CWXZF’s stock grew similarly to EENEF’s over the last 12 months.

CWXZF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as EENEF (49). This means that CWXZF’s stock grew similarly to EENEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWXZFEENEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWXZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMIMX38.39N/A
N/A
FMI Common Stock Investor
MGQSX18.26N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Stars R6
PASIX11.10-0.02
-0.18%
PACE Alternative Strategies A
ECTVX41.27-0.20
-0.48%
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Value C
FPCSX45.09-0.30
-0.66%
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional

CWXZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWXZF and HDIUF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWXZF and HDIUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWXZF
1D Price
Change %
CWXZF100%
-1.48%
HDIUF - CWXZF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RUSMF - CWXZF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
WJXFF - CWXZF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMTNF - CWXZF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
EENEF - CWXZF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EENEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EENEF and RUSMF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EENEF and RUSMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EENEF
1D Price
Change %
EENEF100%
N/A
RUSMF - EENEF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
CWXZF - EENEF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
TMTNF - EENEF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
HDIUF - EENEF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GROUF - EENEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More