CWST
Price
$89.58
Change
+$1.37 (+1.55%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.69B
26 days until earnings call
GFL
Price
$46.63
Change
-$0.04 (-0.09%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
16.94B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWST vs GFL

Header iconCWST vs GFL Comparison
Open Charts CWST vs GFLBanner chart's image
Casella Waste Systems
Price$89.58
Change+$1.37 (+1.55%)
Volume$472.19K
Capitalization5.69B
GFL Environmental
Price$46.63
Change-$0.04 (-0.09%)
Volume$991.83K
Capitalization16.94B
CWST vs GFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWST vs. GFL commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWST is a StrongBuy and GFL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CWST: $89.58 vs. GFL: $46.63)
Brand notoriety: CWST and GFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWST: 83% vs. GFL: 78%
Market capitalization -- CWST: $5.69B vs. GFL: $16.94B
CWST [@Environmental Services] is valued at $5.69B. GFL’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $16.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $88.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CWST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the long-term than CWST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWST is a better buy in the short-term than GFL.

Price Growth

CWST (@Environmental Services) experienced а +3.33% price change this week, while GFL (@Environmental Services) price change was +0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWST is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

GFL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+1.61% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFL($16.9B) has a higher market cap than CWST($5.69B). GFL has higher P/E ratio than CWST: GFL (1620.11) vs CWST (471.47). GFL YTD gains are higher at: 4.793 vs. CWST (-15.339). GFL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.9B vs. CWST (351M). CWST has more cash in the bank: 218M vs. GFL (140M). CWST has less debt than GFL: CWST (1.23B) vs GFL (7.21B). GFL has higher revenues than CWST: GFL (8.08B) vs CWST (1.72B).
CWSTGFLCWST / GFL
Capitalization5.69B16.9B34%
EBITDA351M1.9B18%
Gain YTD-15.3394.793-320%
P/E Ratio471.471620.1129%
Revenue1.72B8.08B21%
Total Cash218M140M156%
Total Debt1.23B7.21B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWST: Fundamental Ratings
CWST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWSTGFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BUZZ35.620.25
+0.71%
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
QOWZ36.430.22
+0.60%
Invesco Nasdaq Free CA Flw Achiev ETF
DDLS41.590.09
+0.22%
WisdomTree Dynamic Intl SmCap Eq ETF
UCON25.140.03
+0.12%
First Trust Smith Unconstrained Pl BdETF
BRHY52.120.02
+0.05%
iShares High Yield Active ETF

CWST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWST has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWST jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWST
1D Price
Change %
CWST100%
+1.55%
WCN - CWST
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
GFL - CWST
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
RSG - CWST
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
CLH - CWST
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
WM - CWST
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
More

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with CWST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then CWST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
-0.09%
CWST - GFL
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
WCN - GFL
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
WM - GFL
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
RSG - GFL
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
CLH - GFL
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More