CWSFF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.04 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.9M
QRHC
Price
$2.17
Change
+$0.07 (+3.33%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
171.05M
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWSFF vs QRHC

Header iconCWSFF vs QRHC Comparison
Open Charts CWSFF vs QRHCBanner chart's image
CIELO WASTE SOLUTIONS
Price$0.04
Change-$0.04 (-50.00%)
Volume$2.32K
Capitalization30.9M
Quest Resource Holding
Price$2.17
Change+$0.07 (+3.33%)
Volume$72.81K
Capitalization171.05M
CWSFF vs QRHC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWSFF vs. QRHC commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWSFF is a Hold and QRHC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CWSFF: $0.04 vs. QRHC: $2.17)
Brand notoriety: CWSFF and QRHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWSFF: 13% vs. QRHC: 59%
Market capitalization -- CWSFF: $30.9M vs. QRHC: $171.05M
CWSFF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $30.9M. QRHC’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $171.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWSFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQRHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CWSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QRHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QRHC is a better buy in the long-term than CWSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWSFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QRHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWSFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QRHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QRHC is a better buy in the short-term than CWSFF.

Price Growth

CWSFF (@Environmental Services) experienced а +10.57% price change this week, while QRHC (@Environmental Services) price change was +7.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

QRHC is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+3.39% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QRHC($171M) has a higher market cap than CWSFF($30.9M). CWSFF YTD gains are higher at: -48.123 vs. QRHC (-66.615). QRHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.8M vs. CWSFF (-33.13M). CWSFF has more cash in the bank: 1.33M vs. QRHC (324K). CWSFF has less debt than QRHC: CWSFF (10M) vs QRHC (67.6M). QRHC has higher revenues than CWSFF: QRHC (288M) vs CWSFF (0).
CWSFFQRHCCWSFF / QRHC
Capitalization30.9M171M18%
EBITDA-33.13M12.8M-259%
Gain YTD-48.123-66.61572%
P/E RatioN/A62.50-
Revenue0288M-
Total Cash1.33M324K411%
Total Debt10M67.6M15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWSFF vs QRHC: Fundamental Ratings
CWSFF
QRHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
502
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
9997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5290
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QRHC's Valuation (91) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWSFF (96) in the null industry. This means that QRHC’s stock grew similarly to CWSFF’s over the last 12 months.

QRHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWSFF (100) in the null industry. This means that QRHC’s stock grew similarly to CWSFF’s over the last 12 months.

QRHC's SMR Rating (97) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWSFF (99) in the null industry. This means that QRHC’s stock grew similarly to CWSFF’s over the last 12 months.

CWSFF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QRHC (90) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that CWSFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QRHC’s over the last 12 months.

QRHC's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CWSFF (100) in the null industry. This means that QRHC’s stock grew significantly faster than CWSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWSFFQRHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEOVF0.140.01
+7.20%
SERNOVA BIOTHERAPEUTICS INC.
ITGGF8.390.15
+1.79%
TG Holding SPA
NPACY1.51N/A
N/A
Quadient SA
SDVKF24.72N/A
N/A
Sandvik AB
SWLFF0.10-0.01
-6.35%
Silver Wolf Exploration Ltd.

CWSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWSFF and CTRNF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWSFF and CTRNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWSFF
1D Price
Change %
CWSFF100%
-48.40%
CTRNF - CWSFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHFFY - CWSFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTQNF - CWSFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QRHC - CWSFF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
AQMS - CWSFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
More

QRHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QRHC and CLH have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QRHC and CLH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QRHC
1D Price
Change %
QRHC100%
+3.33%
CLH - QRHC
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
NVRI - QRHC
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNZA - QRHC
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
PESI - QRHC
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
MEG - QRHC
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
More