Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWS vs XMHQ
CWS vs XMHQ Comparison
Open Charts CWS vs XMHQ
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
Price$66.31
Change-$0.81 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.62M
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Price$106.69
Change+$0.27 (+0.25%)
Volume$730
Net Assets5.28B
CWS vs XMHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWS vs. XMHQ commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWS is a Hold and XMHQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XMHQ has more net assets: 5.29B vs. CWS (172M). XMHQ has a higher annual dividend yield than CWS: XMHQ (3.905) vs CWS (-2.344). CWS was incepted earlier than XMHQ: CWS (9 years) vs XMHQ (19 years). XMHQ (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than CWS (0.65). XMHQ has a higher turnover CWS (24.00) vs CWS (24.00).
| CWS | XMHQ | CWS / XMHQ | |
| Gain YTD | -2.344 | 3.905 | -60% |
| Net Assets | 172M | 5.29B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.25 | 260% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 58.00 | 41% |
| Yield | 0.31 | 0.62 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWS | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 85% | 14 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CWS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWS has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWS jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWS | 100% | -2.64% | ||
| MCO - CWS | 76% Closely correlated | -8.90% | ||
| SYK - CWS | 68% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| ALSN - CWS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| BR - CWS | 66% Closely correlated | -6.25% | ||
| MIDD - CWS | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.54% | ||
More | ||||
XMHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMHQ has been closely correlated with AIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMHQ jumps, then AIT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| AIT - XMHQ | 80% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| SEIC - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | -5.14% | ||
| GGG - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| VNT - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| DCI - XMHQ | 77% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||