Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWS vs SCHM
CWS vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts CWS vs SCHM
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
Price$66.31
Change-$0.81 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.62M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$31.75
Change-$0.18 (-0.56%)
Volume$924
Net Assets13.06B
CWS vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWS vs. SCHM commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWS is a Hold and SCHM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 13.1B vs. CWS (172M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than CWS: SCHM (6.186) vs CWS (-2.344). CWS was incepted earlier than SCHM: CWS (9 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than CWS (0.65). CWS has a higher turnover SCHM (17.00) vs SCHM (17.00).
| CWS | SCHM | CWS / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | -2.344 | 6.186 | -38% |
| Net Assets | 172M | 13.1B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,625% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 17.00 | 141% |
| Yield | 0.31 | 1.39 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWS | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CWS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWS has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWS jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWS | 100% | -2.64% | ||
| MCO - CWS | 76% Closely correlated | -8.90% | ||
| SYK - CWS | 68% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| ALSN - CWS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| BR - CWS | 66% Closely correlated | -6.25% | ||
| MIDD - CWS | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.54% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.43% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.89% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.41% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +7.40% | ||
More | ||||