Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWS vs SCHM
CWS vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts CWS vs SCHM
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
Price$67.73
Change-$0.78 (-1.14%)
Volume$970
Net Assets181.86M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$29.23
Change-$0.60 (-2.01%)
Volume$21.7K
Net Assets12.07B
CWS vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWS vs. SCHM commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWS is a Buy and SCHM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.1B vs. CWS (182M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than CWS: SCHM (8.810) vs CWS (5.775). CWS was incepted earlier than SCHM: CWS (9 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than CWS (0.72). CWS has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| CWS | SCHM | CWS / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 5.775 | 8.810 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 182M | 12.1B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.04 | 1,800% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 13.00 | 185% |
| Yield | 0.57 | 1.43 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWS | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 74% | 10 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CWS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWS has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWS jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.59% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.33% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
More | ||||