Ad is loading...
CWMFX vs RWEBX
CWMFX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts CWMFX vs RWEBX
American Funds Washington Mutual 529F1
Price$58.05
Change-$0.12 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.97B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$58.11
Change-$0.13 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.97B
CWMFX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWMFX vs. RWEBX commentary
Apr 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWMFX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWMFX (177B) and RWEBX (177B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CWMFX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: CWMFX (1.42) vs RWEBX (0.83). CWMFX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: CWMFX (23 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CWMFX (0.68). CWMFX (31.00) and RWEBX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. CWMFX (250) and RWEBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.17 vs. RWEBX (-0.79). CWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 53.47 vs. RWEBX (45.07).
| CWMFX | RWEBX | CWMFX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.06 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.06 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.608 | -4.788 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177B | 177B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.83 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.17 | -0.79 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.46 | 2.31 | 236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.47 | 45.07 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.00 | 45.58 | 156% |