CWLPF
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
16.63M
FLNCF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.26 (-50.98%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
61.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWLPF vs FLNCF

Header iconCWLPF vs FLNCF Comparison
Open Charts CWLPF vs FLNCFBanner chart's image
Caldwell Partners International
Price$0.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$38.1K
Capitalization16.63M
Freelancer
Price$0.25
Change-$0.26 (-50.98%)
Volume$189.2K
Capitalization61.9M
CWLPF vs FLNCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWLPF vs. FLNCF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWLPF is a Hold and FLNCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CWLPF: $0.60)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWLPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • CWLPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWLPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLNCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWLPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FLNCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWLPF is a better buy in the short-term than FLNCF.

Price Growth

CWLPF (@Personnel Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (+1.55% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLNCF($61.9M) has a higher market cap than CWLPF($16.6M). FLNCF has higher P/E ratio than CWLPF: FLNCF (690.50) vs CWLPF (4.14). FLNCF YTD gains are higher at: 150.000 vs. CWLPF (-30.684). CWLPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.9M vs. FLNCF (4.79M). FLNCF has more cash in the bank: 21.2M vs. CWLPF (16.3M). CWLPF has less debt than FLNCF: CWLPF (5.31M) vs FLNCF (17.2M). CWLPF has higher revenues than FLNCF: CWLPF (162M) vs FLNCF (53.3M).
CWLPFFLNCFCWLPF / FLNCF
Capitalization16.6M61.9M27%
EBITDA11.9M4.79M248%
Gain YTD-30.684150.000-20%
P/E Ratio4.14690.501%
Revenue162M53.3M304%
Total Cash16.3M21.2M77%
Total Debt5.31M17.2M31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWLPF vs FLNCF: Fundamental Ratings
CWLPF
FLNCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97100
SMR RATING
1..100
8489
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6034
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1095
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CWLPF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLNCF (95). This means that CWLPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLNCF’s over the last 12 months.

CWLPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as FLNCF (100). This means that CWLPF’s stock grew similarly to FLNCF’s over the last 12 months.

CWLPF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as FLNCF (89). This means that CWLPF’s stock grew similarly to FLNCF’s over the last 12 months.

FLNCF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CWLPF (60). This means that FLNCF’s stock grew similarly to CWLPF’s over the last 12 months.

CWLPF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLNCF (95). This means that CWLPF’s stock grew significantly faster than FLNCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWLPFFLNCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRERF14.75N/A
N/A
Carrefour S.A.
KYSEY8.29N/A
N/A
Kyushu Electric Power
PAFRF0.61N/A
N/A
Pan African Resources PLC
SKYC0.68N/A
N/A
Sky Constant Century Inc.
FSRL9.70-0.04
-0.41%
First Reliance Bancshares, Inc.

CWLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWLPF and RANJF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWLPF and RANJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWLPF
1D Price
Change %
CWLPF100%
N/A
RANJF - CWLPF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RANJY - CWLPF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
RLBY - CWLPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLNCF - CWLPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-50.98%
HQI - CWLPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FLNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLNCF and HQI have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLNCF and HQI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLNCF
1D Price
Change %
FLNCF100%
-50.98%
HQI - FLNCF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RANJY - FLNCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
MPGPF - FLNCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWLPF - FLNCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RLBY - FLNCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More