CWI | IEFA | CWI / IEFA | |
Gain YTD | 2.577 | 3.586 | 72% |
Net Assets | 1.64B | 122B | 1% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 4.00 | 3.00 | 133% |
Yield | 2.67 | 3.04 | 88% |
Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
CWI | IEFA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 9 days ago88% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 9 days ago76% | 9 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 9 days ago81% | 9 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 9 days ago72% | 9 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 9 days ago79% | 9 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 9 days ago77% | 9 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago81% | 17 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago77% | 10 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 9 days ago89% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 9 days ago74% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWI has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWI jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA | 100% | +2.02% | ||
ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.46% | ||
SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.26% | ||
MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.42% | ||
More |