Advertisement
CWH vs RMBL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWH is a Buy and RMBL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CWH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CWH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RMBL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CWH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CWH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RMBL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CWH (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +6.26% price change this week, while RMBL (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -4.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
CWH is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
RMBL is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.44% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| CWH | RMBL | CWH / RMBL | |
| Capitalization | 925M | 75.7M | 1,222% |
| EBITDA | 282M | -3.1M | -9,097% |
| Gain YTD | -28.961 | -63.168 | 46% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.55 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 6.32B | 1.15B | 551% |
| Total Cash | 118M | 41.1M | 287% |
| Total Debt | 3.73B | 585M | 638% |
CWH | RMBL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 48 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CWH's Valuation (19) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMBL (58) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CWH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
CWH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RMBL (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CWH’s stock grew similarly to RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
CWH's SMR Rating (92) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RMBL (99) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CWH’s stock grew similarly to RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
CWH's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RMBL (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CWH’s stock grew similarly to RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
CWH's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMBL (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CWH’s stock grew significantly faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
| CWH | RMBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 20 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ADNYX | 20.43 | 0.09 | +0.44% |
| American Beacon ARK Transfmt Innov Y | |||
| CDCRX | 11.66 | 0.03 | +0.26% |
| Copeland Dividend Growth Fund Class C | |||
| MIMSX | 14.48 | -0.02 | -0.14% |
| BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy Inv | |||
| DIFFX | 12.34 | -0.02 | -0.16% |
| MFS Diversified Income R3 | |||
| BMRRX | 34.97 | -0.45 | -1.27% |
| BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity R | |||
CWH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWH has been loosely correlated with HZO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWH jumps, then HZO could also see price increases.
RMBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBL has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMBL jumps, then AN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMBL | 100% | +2.56% | ||
| AN - RMBL | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| HVT - RMBL | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| ONEW - RMBL | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.24% | ||
| CWH - RMBL | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.19% | ||
| ABG - RMBL | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||