CWH
Price
$20.34
Change
-$0.97 (-4.55%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.26B
3 days until earnings call
LOW
Price
$239.17
Change
-$7.25 (-2.94%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
145.75B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CWH vs LOW

Header iconCWH vs LOW Comparison
Open Charts CWH vs LOWBanner chart's image
Camping World Holdings
Price$20.34
Change-$0.97 (-4.55%)
Volume$1.26M
Capitalization1.26B
Lowe's Companies
Price$239.17
Change-$7.25 (-2.94%)
Volume$3.16M
Capitalization145.75B
CWH vs LOW Comparison Chart
Loading...
CWH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWH vs. LOW commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWH is a Hold and LOW is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (CWH: $22.32 vs. LOW: $250.71)
Brand notoriety: CWH: Not notable vs. LOW: Notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWH: 67% vs. LOW: 90%
Market capitalization -- CWH: $1.26B vs. LOW: $145.75B
CWH [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $1.26B. LOW’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $145.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $9.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLOW’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CWH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LOW’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOW is a better buy in the long-term than CWH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LOW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CWH and LOW are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CWH (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -7.12% price change this week, while LOW (@Specialty Stores) price change was -2.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -3.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWH is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

LOW is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-3.85% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOW($146B) has a higher market cap than CWH($1.26B). CWH has higher P/E ratio than LOW: CWH (50.82) vs LOW (18.88). CWH YTD gains are higher at: 5.882 vs. LOW (2.028). LOW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.6B vs. CWH (336M). LOW has more cash in the bank: 921M vs. CWH (39.6M). CWH has less debt than LOW: CWH (3.86B) vs LOW (40.1B). LOW has higher revenues than CWH: LOW (86.4B) vs CWH (6.23B).
CWHLOWCWH / LOW
Capitalization1.26B146B1%
EBITDA336M13.6B2%
Gain YTD5.8822.028290%
P/E Ratio50.8218.88269%
Revenue6.23B86.4B7%
Total Cash39.6M921M4%
Total Debt3.86B40.1B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWH vs LOW: Fundamental Ratings
CWH
LOW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7272
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6118
SMR RATING
1..100
958
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5856
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
232
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOW's Valuation (12) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as CWH (22) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew similarly to CWH’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWH (61) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWH’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's SMR Rating (8) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is significantly better than the same rating for CWH (95) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew significantly faster than CWH’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as CWH (58) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew similarly to CWH’s over the last 12 months.

CWH's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LOW (32) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that CWH’s stock grew similarly to LOW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWHLOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CWH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

CWH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWH has been loosely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWH jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWH
1D Price
Change %
CWH100%
-2.02%
RUSHB - CWH
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
GPI - CWH
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
PAG - CWH
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
HVT - CWH
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
LAD - CWH
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
More

LOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOW has been closely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOW jumps, then HD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOW
1D Price
Change %
LOW100%
-0.43%
HD - LOW
86%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
FND - LOW
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
PAG - LOW
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
WSM - LOW
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
CWH - LOW
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
More