CWD
Price
$1.87
Change
+$0.03 (+1.63%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.47M
80 days until earnings call
PSBD
Price
$13.76
Change
-$0.14 (-1.01%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
442.05M
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWD vs PSBD

Header iconCWD vs PSBD Comparison
Open Charts CWD vs PSBDBanner chart's image
CaliberCos
Price$1.87
Change+$0.03 (+1.63%)
Volume$136.65K
Capitalization2.47M
Palmer Square Capital BDC
Price$13.76
Change-$0.14 (-1.01%)
Volume$147.41K
Capitalization442.05M
CWD vs PSBD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWD vs. PSBD commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWD is a Hold and PSBD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CWD: $1.84 vs. PSBD: $13.76)
Brand notoriety: CWD and PSBD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWD: 0% vs. PSBD: 310%
Market capitalization -- CWD: $2.47M vs. PSBD: $442.05M
CWD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.47M. PSBD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $442.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePSBD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PSBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSBD is a better buy in the long-term than CWD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSBD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PSBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CWD and PSBD are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CWD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -29.23% price change this week, while PSBD (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

PSBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.77% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSBD($442M) has a higher market cap than CWD($2.47M). PSBD YTD gains are higher at: -4.194 vs. CWD (-86.838). CWD has less debt than PSBD: CWD (83.2M) vs PSBD (774M).
CWDPSBDCWD / PSBD
Capitalization2.47M442M1%
EBITDA-9.9MN/A-
Gain YTD-86.838-4.1942,071%
P/E RatioN/A25.02-
Revenue35.4MN/A-
Total Cash1.57MN/A-
Total Debt83.2M774M11%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWDPSBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
31%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GQFIX12.640.03
+0.24%
GQG Partners Global Quality Value Fd Ins
FRIQX12.110.02
+0.17%
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income M
BMPSX93.43-0.09
-0.10%
ProFunds Materials UltraSector Svc
QCSCX22.01-0.04
-0.18%
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
FCECX34.97-0.08
-0.23%
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret C

CWD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWD and SFES have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWD and SFES's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWD
1D Price
Change %
CWD100%
N/A
SFES - CWD
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRBG - CWD
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
KBDC - CWD
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
BENF - CWD
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
PSBD - CWD
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
More

PSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSBD has been loosely correlated with NCDL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSBD jumps, then NCDL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSBD
1D Price
Change %
PSBD100%
-1.01%
NCDL - PSBD
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
SLRC - PSBD
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
MFIC - PSBD
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
CGBD - PSBD
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
OBDC - PSBD
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
More